2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated production and utility system approach for optimizing industrial unit operations

Abstract: To meet utility demands some industrial units use onsite utility system. Traditionally, the management of such type of industrial units is carried out in three sequential steps: scheduling of the manufacturing unit by minimizing inventory, estimating the utility needs of manufacturing unit and finally operation planning of the utility system. This article demonstrates the value of an integrated approach which couples the scheduling of manufacturing unit with operational planning of the utility system. A discre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is generally classified into sequential (Mařík, Schindler & Stluka, 2008) and integrated (Agha et al, 2010;Mitra et al, 2013;Zhao, Rong, Feng & Dong, 2014) solutions. The sequential approaches have the master and slave form in which manufacturing task scheduling, energy demand forecast and energy supply operation planning are carried out consecutively.…”
Section: Current Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is generally classified into sequential (Mařík, Schindler & Stluka, 2008) and integrated (Agha et al, 2010;Mitra et al, 2013;Zhao, Rong, Feng & Dong, 2014) solutions. The sequential approaches have the master and slave form in which manufacturing task scheduling, energy demand forecast and energy supply operation planning are carried out consecutively.…”
Section: Current Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1. Schematic of on-site energy supply for manufacturing systems Moreover, recent studies have illustrated additional system improvements can be achieved through combining production and on-site energy supply management (Agha, Thery, Hetreux, Hait & Le Lann, 2010;Meckler & Hyman, 2010). In these cases, production objectives such as make-span or inventory minimization are combined with energy oriented objectives such as operational cost minimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, thermodynamic insights, such as the Willans line, are used to describe the component on an input-output basis (Ashok and Banerjee, 2003) [41]. It is important to note that the choice can be made for each component individually and researchers often combine the three approaches (Yusta et al, 2008 [42]; Agha et al, 2010 [16]; VelascoGarcia et al, 2011 [43]). In the following, we describe the aforementioned papers that use thermodynamic balance equations in more detail.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marshman et al (2010) [39] employ a constant efficiency model for steam turbines and boiler to optimize the cogeneration facility of a paper and pulp mill. Agha et al (2010) [16] integrate the scheduling of a co-generation facility into the resource task network formulation (RTN) that has been used for the scheduling of manufacturing facilities (Pantelides, 1994) [44]. They use piece-wise linear approximations for boiler efficiencies and constant steam turbine efficiencies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation