Integrated weed management in white bean production

Sikkema, Peter H.; Vyn, Richard J.; Shropshire, Christy; Soltani, Nader

doi:10.4141/cjps07180

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In other studies, there was no difference between s-metolachlor and trifluralin applied PPI for the control of AMARE and SETVI [16]. However, trifluralin applied PPI provided better control of CHEAL (83% vs. 71%) compared with s-metolachlor [16].…”

Section: Weed Controlmentioning

confidence: 82%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Weed Control, Environmental Impact and Profitability of Pre-Plant Incorporated Herbicides in White Bean

Soltani¹,

Nurse²,

Shropshire³

et al. 2012

AJPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three field experiments were conducted over a three-year period (2009 to 2011) to evaluate various preplant incorporated (PPI) herbicides in white bean in Ontario, Canada. There was minimal visible injury in white bean for any of the treatments evaluated. The control of AMARE, AMBEL, CHEAL, SETVI, and SINAR ranged 91% -93%, 13% -21%, 56% -92%, 96% -98%, and 16% -24% with pendimethalin, 93% -99%, 34% -43%, 65% -99%, 95% -100%, and 20% -47% with trifluralin, 66% -77%, 61% -76%, 64% -86%, 94% -99%, and 52% -74% with EPTC, 92% -98%, 27% -48%, 28% -76%, 96% -99%, and 33% -59% with s-metolachlor, 98% -99%, 50% -72%, 33% -88%, 98% -99%, and 56% -78% with dimethenamid, and 98% -100%, 72% -84%, 97% -100%, 77% -88%, and 98% -100% with imazethapyr, respectively. Weed density and dry weight reduction were similar to visible weed control. Imazethapyr applied PPI at the 75 g·ai·ha −1 provided yield equivalent to the weed-free check in 2009 and 2011. All other herbicide treatments had significantly lower yield than weed-free check. All herbicide treatments except pendimethalin at 1080 g·ai·ha , and imazethapyr at 75 g·ai·ha −1 had yield equivalent to the weed-free check in 2010. Based on environmental impact (EI) analysis, the herbicide program with the lowest environmental risk was imazethapyr followed by dimethenamid-p, trifluralin, s-metolachlor, EPTC, and then pendimethalin. Economic analysis of herbicide treatments evaluated indicates that imazethapyr had the greatest positive impact on profit margins, followed by dimethenamid-p and EPTC, followed by s-metolachlor and trifluralin and then pendimethalin.

show abstract

Section: Weed Controlmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…However, trifluralin applied PPI provided better control of CHEAL (83% vs. 71%) compared with s-metolachlor [16]. Wall [17] reported improved control of AMARE and CHEAL when imazethapyr was applied at 50 g·ha −1 in white bean.…”

Section: Weed Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Weed Control, Environmental Impact and Profitability of Pre-Plant Incorporated Herbicides in White Bean

Soltani¹,

Nurse²,

Shropshire³

et al. 2012

AJPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Inter-row cultivation performed twice following a soil-applied herbicide resulted in improved control of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. (Sikkema et al, 2008). Avola et al (2008) found that chemical weed control in Vicia faba L and Cicer arietinum L. can be avoided by adopting an inter-row cultivator.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanical weed control on small-size dry bean and its response to cross-flaming

Martelloni

Frasconi

Fontanelli

et al. 2016

Span. j. agric. res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dry bean (<em>Phaseolus vulgaris </em>L.) can be a profitable crop for farmers; however controlling weeds effectively without a decrease in yield remains a problem. An example where mechanical weed control is difficult to conduct is dry bean ‘Toscanello’, which is a small sized high-income niche product growing low to the ground. Concerning intra-row weed control, also flame weeding could be an opportunity but the dry bean heat tolerance needs to be studied. The aims of this research were to study the weed control efficacy of a spring-tine harrow and an inter-row cultivator in this bean variety, and to test the tolerance of dry bean cultivated under weed-free conditions to cross-flaming applied with different liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) doses. Flame weeding was applied at BBCH 13 and BBCH 14 bean growth stages by pairs of burners producing direct double flame acting into the intra-row space, with bean plants placed in the middle. The results suggest that the spring-tine harrow used two times at BBCH 13 and 14, respectively, lead to a yield similar to that of the weedy control. The inter-row cultivator could be an opportunity for small-sized dry bean crops producers, enabling them to obtain a similar yield compared to the hand-weeded control. Concerning the bean tolerance to cross-flaming<em> </em>the results showed that bean flamed at BBCH 13 stage had little tolerance to cross-flaming. Bean flamed at BBCH 14 stage was tolerant until an LPG dose of 39 kg/ha, giving yield responses similar to those observed in the non-flamed control.

show abstract

“…Data for each production system and year were analyzed separately, using the PROC GLM procedure in SAS (SAS Institute, 2004). Subsequently, combined ANOVA was performed after testing for the homogeneity of variances (Bartlett, 1947).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Also, two interrow cultivations during vegetative period were used each year. Two interrow cultivations following a soil-applied herbicide provided improved control of weeds (Sikkema et al, 2008). Thus, two additional hand weedings during reproductive period kept the fi eld mostly free from weeds during the growing season.…”

Section: On-farm Conventional Production Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection for Dry Bean Yield On‐Station Versus On‐Farm Conventional and Organic Production Systems

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High yielding cultivars adapted to conventional and organic production system would maximize efficiency of nutrient usage and reduce dependence on pesticides. The objective of this study was to determine if separate breeding efforts are needed to obtain high yielding dry bean breeding lines for on‐farm organic (FO) and on‐farm conventional (FC) production systems. The six highest yielding breeding lines selected from each of FO, FC, and on‐station conventional (SC) production systems in two populations (1WS, 2WS) and their parents were evaluated for days to maturity, 100‐seed weight, and seed yield in 2007 and 2008. The production system and genotype effects were significant (P ≤ 0.01) for all three traits. Seed yield gains were between 10.5% in FC and 15.0% in SC in 1WS and between 6.2% in FO and 21.0% in SC in 2WS. Seed yield of breeding lines selected in SC was higher than those selected in FC and FO when tested across the three production systems. The SC seed yield was positively associated with seed yield in FC and FO in 2WS and with seed yield in FC in 1WS. The FC and FO seed yields were positively associated only in 2WS. The highest yielding breeding lines within and across the three PS varied by the production system in which they were selected. Thus, breeding high yielding cultivars in SC or FC may serve FO in some populations, whereas a separate breeding for FO and FC may be justified in other populations if the accompanying seed yield gains would off‐set the added costs involved in the production system specific breeding.

show abstract

Integrated weed management in white bean production

Cited by 8 publications

References 18 publications

Weed Control, Environmental Impact and Profitability of Pre-Plant Incorporated Herbicides in White Bean

Weed Control, Environmental Impact and Profitability of Pre-Plant Incorporated Herbicides in White Bean

Mechanical weed control on small-size dry bean and its response to cross-flaming

Selection for Dry Bean Yield On‐Station Versus On‐Farm Conventional and Organic Production Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About