2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Corpus Linguistics in Critical Literacy Pedagogy: A Case Study of Lance Armstrong's Transformation from a Titleholder to a Fraud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Freake et al, 2011;Jaworska & Krishnamurthy, 2012), examining key function/grammatical words (e.g. Pearce, 2014), and using other analytical models and/or theories; for example, functional theory (El-Falaky, 2015;Lee, 2016;Lindayana et al, 2018), translation theory (Murphy, 2013), social theory (Mulderrig, 2008;, critical stylistics (Jeffries & Evans, 2013), contrastive analysis (Schroter & Storjohann, 2015), sociolinguistics (Chiluwa, 2012), critical literacy pedagogy (Abid & Manan, 2015), multimodality (Edwards & Milani, 2014), topic modeling (Tornberg & Tornberg, 2016;Iswanto et al, 2018;Jurgaitis, 2018), pragmatics (Triebl, 2015), genre theory (Skalicky, 2013), theory of governmentality (MacDonald & Hunter, 2013) and theory of argumentation (Lippi & Torroni, 2016;Azhari et al, 2018). Nevertheless, as note, "It seems ... that the main aim of many studies in combining corpus methods and CDA is to arrive at more accurate, insightful, objective, and generalizable findings rather than contributing to a specific discourse-oriented theory" (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freake et al, 2011;Jaworska & Krishnamurthy, 2012), examining key function/grammatical words (e.g. Pearce, 2014), and using other analytical models and/or theories; for example, functional theory (El-Falaky, 2015;Lee, 2016;Lindayana et al, 2018), translation theory (Murphy, 2013), social theory (Mulderrig, 2008;, critical stylistics (Jeffries & Evans, 2013), contrastive analysis (Schroter & Storjohann, 2015), sociolinguistics (Chiluwa, 2012), critical literacy pedagogy (Abid & Manan, 2015), multimodality (Edwards & Milani, 2014), topic modeling (Tornberg & Tornberg, 2016;Iswanto et al, 2018;Jurgaitis, 2018), pragmatics (Triebl, 2015), genre theory (Skalicky, 2013), theory of governmentality (MacDonald & Hunter, 2013) and theory of argumentation (Lippi & Torroni, 2016;Azhari et al, 2018). Nevertheless, as note, "It seems ... that the main aim of many studies in combining corpus methods and CDA is to arrive at more accurate, insightful, objective, and generalizable findings rather than contributing to a specific discourse-oriented theory" (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applied linguistics, corpus linguistics functions: Frequency, collocation, and keyness, are popular in locating and representing a variety of stakeholders in datasets namely, adults in personal ads (Bakar, 2014), athletes (Abid & Manan, 2015), refugees and asylum seekers (Baker et al, 2008), and student activists (Brindle, 2016). Frequency function was widely utilized in education research, particularly, on language learners, teachers, and teaching materials (Aşık, 2017;Sert & Aşık, 2020).…”
Section: Stakeholders and Corpus Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of theories are utilized in the study: critical literacy pedagogy, critical thinking, and the use of folklores. Critical Literacy Pedagogy (CLP)-a combination of critical literacy and critical pedagogy principles-is considered to be potential in providing the students opportunities to learn to think and to view a phenomena from a critical lense, to relate what they read and experience in the classrooms with things that happened in their surroundings (learning to read the words and the world) [10], and analize phenomena based on "today's context" [11].…”
Section: Comprehensive Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an attempt to bridge the introduction of the concept of critical thinking that would be difficult for students to understand when it is presented in form of abstract concepts and not bind their experiences [42]. This bridging concept is part of an effort to leverage the abstract concept of critical thinking analysis in today's context [11]. [42] was conducted at the time of explicit teaching on "The Author's Purpose", beginning with explaining (a) the importance of knowing "The Author's Purpose," (b) theories about "The Author's Purpose," and (c) "The Author's Purpose in movies, news and advertisements" (See Dialog 5.2).…”
Section: A Explaining the Author's Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation