Integrating critical and trans-affirming pedagogies in argumentation and debate: A heuristic narrative

Mapes, Meggie

doi:10.1080/17404622.2018.1467567

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Talking and interacting is what debate is. Related to that, [11], [12] explains that to reach a well-informed decision on a subject, debate is a process of investigation and lobbying. Additionally, [13] claimed that "discussion is an activity that requires a set of discourse for a specific topic."…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Turn-Taking Analysis on Students’ Debate: Conversation Analysis

Jelimun,

Ekalia,

Susanto

et al. 2023

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2022, 21-22 October 20

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the conversation, normally the participants do not pay attention or are aware of the turn-taking that each one should consider. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate turn-taking patterns which are IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback) in students' NUDC. The participants of this study were the NUDC teams from classes 2020A and 2021C of the English Study Program of UNIKA St. Paulus, Ruteng. The data were collected using the qualitative method to describe the IRF pattern in students' debates. The procedure for collecting the data was recording the debate, transcribing the spoken text, and analyzing and identifying the IRF pattern used by each debater. The result of the study was the dominant pattern used is IRF with 12 times (44.4%), the second is I with 8 times (29.6%, the third is RF with 6 times (22.2%), while the lowest is IR with only used one time (3.7%). The recommendation for the next researchers is to study the correlation between understanding the debate motion and turn-taking in debate.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%