Integrating Eco‐Innovations and Stakeholder Engagement for Sustainable Development and a Social License to Operate

Abstract

Eco‐innovations of corporations are seen to contribute to the mitigation of negative impacts on the natural environment. However, despite environmental gains, some eco‐innovations fail in the marketplace while others succeed. We propose a framework that reflects the connection between eco‐innovations and their social license to operate. Corporations can increase the market success of eco‐innovations if they can gain a social license to operate based on fair and trustworthy stakeholder engagement shaped by the context of their societal environment. Eco‐innovations can be transformed following management steps of an internal and external evaluation, the analysis of companies' interactional status, and conformation activities for the introduction of sustainability‐oriented innovations. We conclude that the successful transformation of eco‐innovations requires the inclusion of social factors, such as stakeholders' multiple claims, to secure a social license to operate and thereby even reduce costs by avoiding sketchy corporate social responsibility measures. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Reporting on sustainable development: A comparison of three Italian small and medium‐sized enterprises

“…In general terms, they improve their social license to operate (Provasnek, Sentic, & Schmid, 2017). In addition, the reporting on these elements can represent a distinctive aspect as compared with those companies that adopt traditional reporting models.…”

Corporate culture, environmental innovation and financial performance

“…Therefore, firms' ecological behaviour has aroused strong concerns in governments, the media and the public. Since environmental innovation can improve energy efficiency and reduce the environmental impact of production processes and products (Cecere, Corrocher, Gossart, & Ozman, ; De, ; Provasnek, Sentic, & Schmid, ; Rennings, ), many countries have formulated a series of measures to prompt firms to carry out environmental innovation. However, some firms have experienced significant downturns in financial performance after implementing environmental innovation (Forsman, ; Forsman, Temel, & Uotila, ; Paraschiv, Nemoianu, Langă, & Szabó, ) and have not achieved Porter's “win‐win” situation (Porter & Linde, ), which consequently reduces firms' enthusiasm for environmental innovation.…”

Building legitimacy and trust between a mining company and a community to earn social license to operate: A Peruvian case study

“…Stakeholder representation on decision-making committees can contribute to stakeholder engagement by demonstrating that mining companies are cognizant of stakeholder concerns (Brennan & Merkl-Davies, 2014;Carels et al, 2013;Provasnek, Sentic, & Schmid, 2017). In the case of the Quellaveco project, one of the final agreements was that a Participatory Monitoring Committee and a Surveillance Committee, formed by key stakeholders, civil society, and institutions belonging to the local and regional governments would be created to monitor the environmental impact of the mine's operation.…”