2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating field survey and orthophoto information to monitor coastal habitats — A pilot study to develop methods and resolve key issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet for the purpose of identifying and delimiting detailed structural features within habitat types, appropriate satellite data (e.g., VHR image data from IKONOS, Quickbird or Worldview II) remains expensive if needed for large areas, and in regions such as Denmark difficult to acquire as a national coverage for a single year due to cloud cover. Aerial-based imagery also has some advantages, the major one being higher spatial resolution (Mullerova et al, 2013;Pringle et al, 2009), the reduction of certain atmospheric effects, and in some cases, better availability and lower cost (Juel et al, 2013). The higher spatial resolution opens possibilities for mapping that is closer to field-survey derived mapping scales, making them intuitively understandable and possible to verify in the field (Mullerova et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yet for the purpose of identifying and delimiting detailed structural features within habitat types, appropriate satellite data (e.g., VHR image data from IKONOS, Quickbird or Worldview II) remains expensive if needed for large areas, and in regions such as Denmark difficult to acquire as a national coverage for a single year due to cloud cover. Aerial-based imagery also has some advantages, the major one being higher spatial resolution (Mullerova et al, 2013;Pringle et al, 2009), the reduction of certain atmospheric effects, and in some cases, better availability and lower cost (Juel et al, 2013). The higher spatial resolution opens possibilities for mapping that is closer to field-survey derived mapping scales, making them intuitively understandable and possible to verify in the field (Mullerova et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%