Integrating international student mobility in the belt and road initiative

Abstract

Purpose Before the turn of the century, taking overseas students was more about a diplomatic issue dominated by the state in China, for which reason this section is relatively independent within the higher education system. However, evidence from a series of new policy documents and their impacts suggests that international student mobility (ISM) has been intensively shaped by the central government in the desire to promote its national strategy, namely the belt and road initiative. ISM policy, although with a significant proportion marketized, was introduced for a clear purpose of cultural diplomacy. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach Looking beyond the debate of market-driven vs state-dominated, this paper attempts to provide a thorough understanding of this changing pattern based on examination of key changes of policy statements along with official data analysis. Findings This paper argues that the new pattern must be understood against a context of a hierarchy of higher education institutes in contemporary China: a sector led by a small number of prestigious universities generously funded by the central government with a large number of ordinary universities underfunded and eager to generate income. Prestigious institutes enroll international students to satisfy performance indicators listed by policies like “Double First-rate”; other universities, benefiting from the reputation and momentum generated by the top ones, take self-funded students for profit. Originality/value By making good use of both performance indicators and market motives, the country managed to move a state-dominated ISM policy in the twentieth century into the existing state-steering marketization model and made China a major destination for overseas study.

The Impact of the “Belt and Road Initiative” on International Scholarship Students

“…Then in the 1970s, students from Western countries were allowed to study in China after diplomatic relations between the U.S. and other Western countries and China normalized. However, the student exchange at that time was limited to a modest number due to a tight budget (Wen, 2018 ; Wu and Chan, 2019 ).…”

The Effect of Cultural Attachment on Perceived Image of Sojourn Destination: an Evidence From Chinese Descent Students of Asean Coming to Guangxi, China

“…China has been committed to the worldwide export of its culture in the hope of bringing in more international visitors, of which overseas Chinese are also an important target customer group. The"Belt and Road Initiative" policy introduced by China's government has successfully brought in a growing number of international Chinese students to China in general and also to Guangxi specifically (Wu & Chan, 2019;Gong, 2018). These students are the bearers of Chinese immigrant culture overseas.…”

New Thoughts on Formation of Tourism Perceived Images: An Investigation of Guangxi’s Overseas Chinese Students from ASEAN

“…Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in southwest China is one zone that expects to capitalize on international students to promote tourism. Guangxi's year-on-year increase in overseas students is attributed to the "Belt and Road Initiative agreement" advocated by the Chinese government, which promotes mutual recognition of academic qualifications between countries (Wu & Chan, 2019;Gong, 2018). Geographically, Guangxi is located in the south of China and has been one of the southward exports of the "Maritime Silk Road" since ancient times, as well as a major bridge for trade between China and ASEAN (Cheng, 2013).…”