2016
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16x683533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating primary mental health care and mental health promotion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual patient data from all the participants formed the present data set (Table 1). Study quality was judged to be high, and overall risk of bias was low, although study attrition was rated as high in 1 study and moderate in 3 others (eTables 4 and 5 in the Supplement). There was near-perfect agreement between the reviewers (interrater reliability: QUIPS, κ = 0.96; GRADE, κ = 1.00).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual patient data from all the participants formed the present data set (Table 1). Study quality was judged to be high, and overall risk of bias was low, although study attrition was rated as high in 1 study and moderate in 3 others (eTables 4 and 5 in the Supplement). There was near-perfect agreement between the reviewers (interrater reliability: QUIPS, κ = 0.96; GRADE, κ = 1.00).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This construction in talk suggests that the reason for deficiencies in care are not so much the GPs' responsibility as they are the result of external factors which have placed them under undue pressure (lines 235 to 236), namely that there is not enough service capacity to cope with demand and the complexity of mental health issues (line 237). There is support for this notion in recent literature which highlights front-line areas such as primary care, emergency and acute psychiatric departments as particularly exposed to excessive workloads and associated stress and burnout (Durbin et al, 2016;Terry, 2018;Thomas and Morris, 2016;Wilkinson, 2015). This may be due to increasing demand, administrative burdens and caps placed on resources, (Hannigan et al, 2018;Simpson et al, 2016;Wilkinson, 2015).…”
Section: "Well They Pass the Buck Then Don't They?" Expectations Of The Gp Role Limiting Care Continuitymentioning
confidence: 98%