Integrating quantitative and qualitative methodologies for the assessment of health care systems: emergency medicine in post-conflict Serbia

Abstract

BackgroundDue to the complexity of health system reform in the post-conflict, post-disaster, and development settings, attempts to restructure health services are fraught with pitfalls that are often unanticipated because of inadequate preliminary assessments. Our proposed Integrated Multimodal Assessment – combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies – may provide a more robust mechanism for identifying programmatic priorities and critical barriers for appropriate and sustainable health system interventions. The purpose of this study is to describe this novel multimodal assessment using emergency medicine in post-conflict Serbia as a model.MethodsIntegrated quantitative and qualitative methodologies – system characterization and observation, focus group discussions, free-response questionnaires, and by-person factor analysis – were used to identify needs, problems, and potential barriers to the development of emergency medicine in Serbia. Participants included emergency and pre-hospital personnel from all emergency medical institutions in Belgrade.ResultsDemographic data indicate a loosely ordered network of part-time emergency departments supported by 24-hour pre-hospital services and an academic emergency center. Focus groups and questionnaires reveal significant impediments to delivery of care and suggest development priorities. By-person factor analysis subsequently divides respondents into distinctive attitudinal types, compares participant opinions, and identifies programmatic priorities.ConclusionsBy combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies, our Integrated Multimodal Assessment identified critical needs and barriers to emergency medicine development in Serbia and may serve as a model for future health system assessments in post-conflict, post-disaster, and development settings.

Hospital management training and improvement in managerial skills: Serbian experience

“…In general, as top managers they managed hospitals with low involvement from other level managers (e.g., heads of departments), neglecting the value of multidisciplinary approach and teamwork. According to international experts, planning in hospitals and in other health institutions had no strategic character [16,17,20]. Historically there has not been a multi-departmental approach to health planning.…”

Dynamics of Health Care Financing and Spending in Serbia in the XXI Century

“…Modernizing health information system since reliability and timely information are mandatory for the health care system reform (72), represents the solid base on which planning, decision-making, managing, monitoring and implementation of reforms can be done (1). Invention of the informationcommunication system serving for managing the health care system (73) and gathering of all information system networks established by health institutions (74), insurance funds and regional centers (75) would tremendously aid in all of the mentioned key factors to health care system reform (76)(77)(78).…”

Assessments of health services availability in humanitarian emergencies: a review of assessments in Haiti and Sudan using a health systems approach

“…There is a growing body of research on the assessment of national health systems performance in low-income countries, particularly in stable development contexts. There is, however, limited practical guidance on the assessment of disrupted health systems in acute crises or as part of health systems rebuilding following conflicts and disasters [ 26 – 28 ]. In stable development contexts, health facilities assessments provide a useful means of monitoring the availability of and readiness to deliver health services.…”