2014
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2014.967250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating risks of climate change into water management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Arnell, 2011, Hughes et al 2011, Xu et al 2010. Several sources of uncertainty exist (Döll et al 2015), the largest of which, in many cases, has been attributed to the different projections of future climate provided by different global climate models (e.g. Graham et al 2007, Prudhomme and).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Arnell, 2011, Hughes et al 2011, Xu et al 2010. Several sources of uncertainty exist (Döll et al 2015), the largest of which, in many cases, has been attributed to the different projections of future climate provided by different global climate models (e.g. Graham et al 2007, Prudhomme and).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Only in the dry Sahelian part, the AMAX variability increases significantly during wet periods, and more extreme flood magnitudes become more probable. In order to account for dynamics of the entire basin and include climate change induced flood risk, detailed modelling studies on a subregional level are a prerequisite in order to project future flood risks in the NRB and discuss uncertainties [82]. Such an effort should include land-use change, population density and vulnerability, all of which are very likely strong factors for flood risk in the basin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrologic modeling should also be used to drive models of sediment load for projecting reservoir in-filling and wear and tear on turbines (Toniolo and Schultz, 2005). National assessments are important for understanding relative hydroclimate vulnerability (Rummukainen et al, 2003;Hurd et al, 1999;Lettenmaier et al, 1999), while basinlevel models can provide more specific projections to inform water management (Döll et al, 2015;Frigon et al, 2007). In several studies of the Colorado River basin, it was found that under most projected climate scenarios, reduced flows in the river result in annual in-stream allocations being met less frequently, along with hydropower production declines (Vano et al, 2010;Rajagopalan et al, 2009;Christensen, 2004).…”
Section: Long-term Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%