2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating robust timetabling in line plan optimization for railway systems

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formula ( 5) is a max-min objective function. According to Burggraeve [28], we introduce an auxiliary constraint as follows:…”
Section: Optimization From the Perspective Of Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formula ( 5) is a max-min objective function. According to Burggraeve [28], we introduce an auxiliary constraint as follows:…”
Section: Optimization From the Perspective Of Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Representing the desired production; • Providing room for the disperded energy, in the production process. Once we have specificed correctly the rules of such a production system, the optimization techniques that classically apply to plans (see, for instance, [25,3] for recent advancements) can generate perfect plans to execute. However, in this configurations, the practical cases should identify exceptional configurations in which it is not possible to forecast in a correct way the energy absorbed (or other numerical variables associated to the plan, such as delays of time, or money waste).…”
Section: Scenario 2 Energy Production Waste Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cacchiani and Toth (2012) published a literature review on macroscopic timetable models, like the Periodic Event Scheduling Problem (e.g. Serafini and Ukovich, 1989;Liebchen and Möhring , 2007;Schmidt and Schöbel, 2015;Burggraeve et al, 2017) and the Train Timetabling Problem (e.g. Caprara et al, 2002;Cacchiani et al, 2016).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%