1995
DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(94)00195-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating scenic and recreational amenities into numerical forest planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
10

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
39
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…1, we would like to emphasize the role of information already obtainable by the simple visualizations presented in this study. Once derived, the preferential information could be incorporated as an objective on choice of treatments for compartments in numerical optimization (Pukkala et al 1995). Such information may become more valuable as situations where multi-attribute comparisons are required become more frequent (e.g., Pukkala et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, we would like to emphasize the role of information already obtainable by the simple visualizations presented in this study. Once derived, the preferential information could be incorporated as an objective on choice of treatments for compartments in numerical optimization (Pukkala et al 1995). Such information may become more valuable as situations where multi-attribute comparisons are required become more frequent (e.g., Pukkala et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El recreo es uno de los servicios ambientales más estudiados por la economía ambiental (Millward, 1993;Parsons y Keraly, 1994;Pukkala et al, 1995;Tyrvainen, 2001;Tyrvainen y Vaananen, 1998). Si bien es relativamente sencillo georreferenciar los puntos de uso recreativo, las valoraciones se centran habitualmente sobre un conjunto: un bosque, un área significativa o protegida… La cuestión es ¿cuánta superficie es realmente necesaria para que el valor del uso en el punto (o línea en caso de senderos) no varíe?…”
Section: Tipologías De Valoresunclassified
“…These advancements in harvest scheduling allowed for more complex analyses, such as maximum clear-cut size (Kurttila 2001;Boston & Bettinger 2001;Murray & Weintraub 2002), spatial restrictions on clear-cut opening size (Nelson & Brodie 1990;Roise 1990;Dahlin & Sallnas 1993;Richards & Gunn 2003), and the effects of different clear-cut restrictions on economic outputs (Barrett et al 1998). Spatial requirements were also considered in ecological and environmental research (Pukkala et al 1995;Hof & Bevers 2000;Kurttila 2001), optimization of wildlife habitat and timber in the managed forest ecosystems (Hof & Joyce 1993;Kašpar et al 2015), land classification strategies (Borges & Hoganson 2000), harvest clustering and reducing fragmentation (Öhman & Lamas 2003, Öhman &d Wikström 2008, and wind damage risk assessment (Lohmander & Helles 1997;Konôpka & Konôpka 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%