Integrating the Readiness and IS-Impact Constructs in the Rural Area Context: A Model Development

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop a new model by integrating the impact and readiness of the model that has been done before. The steps are taken a start from adopting, combining and adapting the previous model, namely by identifying the impact of ICT readiness in the countryside. The researchers developed the model based on the input-process-output logic and the processional and causal model of the IS impact models. This study has identified 9 variables and 45 indicators that have a relationship between impact and readiness. The findings of this study are the limited number of human resources who control ICT, the inequality of networks, the adequacy of institutional needs and the existence of budget support from authorized institutions and information systems that have not accommodated all service needs and have not been implemented in all villages. The conclusion of this study is combination model by integrating four preparedness model variables and five variables from the success model. In addition to the development process, clarity of coherent relationships between models, variables, indicators, and questions from each indicator are also presented in this study.

Integrating the Readiness and IS-Impact Constructs in the Rural Area Context: A Questionnaire Testing

“…[18] This study measures the readiness model and impact of success with a questionnaire (Figure 2). Measurement of the model used is indirectly inspired by the measurement of models that many other researchers [15], such as the development of models carried out by Antara and Mertz [19,20], viewed from the practical side that Information Systems research tends to be developed from previous models rather than based on empirical studies [21]. Therefore the measurement of the model in this study follows the previous researchers with the following stages, namely by adopting, combining, and adapting the previous model [22][23][24], The following nine variables are used in this study, consisting of four readiness variables and five information system impact variables.…”

“…List of variables and indicators[21] being independent, accepting challenges, receiving stimulation, having competitiveness Discomfort Complex, have difficulty, dependence on the system, lack of support, less accurate Insecurity Failure can occur, there can be threats, reduce interaction, have disturbances, are doubtful Individual Impact Enhance learning, increase awareness, increase Decision Effectiveness, increase Individual Productivity Organization Impact increase organizational costs, raises staff requirements, reduce operational costs, increase productivity, better results System Quality Easy to learn, easy to use, easy to access, requires user requirements, complete system features…”

Examining Readiness of E-Learning Implementation using Information System Readiness Impact Model

“…This study measures the readiness model and impact of success with a questionnaire (Figure 2). Measurement of the model used is indirectly inspired by the measurement of models that many other researchers [16], such as the development of models carried out by Antara and Mertz [20,21], viewed from the practical side that Information Systems research tends to be developed from previous models rather than based on empirical studies [22]. Therefore the measurement of the model in this study follows the previous researchers with the following stages, namely by adopting, combining, and adapting the previous model [23][24][25].…”

“…LIST OF VARIABLES AND INDICATORS[22] Questionnaires INV5 The e-learning supports users to be more successful DCF1 The e-learning confuses users DCF2 The e-learning is difficult to use DCF3 The e-learning is operated with limited DCF4 The e-learning is not fully supported DCF5 The e-learning is not according to plan ISC1…”