Integration at the Round Table: Marine Spatial Planning in Multi-Stakeholder Settings

Abstract

Marine spatial planning (MSP) is often considered as a pragmatic approach to implement an ecosystem based management in order to manage marine space in a sustainable way. This requires the involvement of multiple actors and stakeholders at various governmental and societal levels. Several factors affect how well the integrated management of marine waters will be achieved, such as different governance settings (division of power between central and local governments), economic activities (and related priorities), external drivers, spatial scales, incentives and objectives, varying approaches to legislation and political will. We compared MSP in Belgium, Norway and the US to illustrate how the integration of stakeholders and governmental levels differs among these countries along the factors mentioned above. Horizontal integration (between sectors) is successful in all three countries, achieved through the use of neutral ‘round-table’ meeting places for all actors. Vertical integration between government levels varies, with Belgium and Norway having achieved full integration while the US lacks integration of the legislature due to sharp disagreements among stakeholders and unsuccessful partisan leadership. Success factors include political will and leadership, process transparency and stakeholder participation, and should be considered in all MSP development processes.

Healing Brazil's Blue Amazon: The Role of Knowledge Networks in Nurturing Cross-Scale Transformations at the Frontlines of Ocean Sustainability

“…public process of analyzing and allocating the spatial and temporal distribution of human activities in marine areas to achieve ecological, economic and social objectives that have been specified through a political process" (http://msp.ioc-unesco.org/). MSPs involve collaborative and social learning processes that are expected to leverage societal transformation to address ocean issues at higher spatial levels (Ehler and Douvere, 2009;Olsen et al, 2014). Yet, MSP is still in nascent stages in most countries worldwide and the conflicts and equity issues its implementation entails are at the center of global sustainability challenges requiring multi-directional, purposive, deliberate and socially just negotiation processes (Berkhout, 2002;Chapin et al, 2009;O'Brien, 2011;Merrie and Olsson, 2014).…”

Aquaculture Site-Selection and Marine Spatial Planning: The Roles of GIS-Based Tools and Models

“…In the Baltic region, even countries without existing aquaculture facilities are expected to consider future operations as part of their emerging marine spatial plans (project 2013). The Finnish regional fisheries administration prepared regional aquaculture site selection plans that identify offshore areas where existing production can be concentrated and new production begun, using a participative process and Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping as a supporting tool (Olofsson and Andersson 2014).…”

Institutional Mapping Towards Developing a Framework for Sustainable Marine Spatial Planning

“…As for this review the marine spatial planning is about introducing the framework of managing the spatial activities among marine institutions to achieve strategic sustainable development (Jay et al, 2016;Dunstan et al, 2016;Caldow et al, 2015;Olsen et al, 2014;Kelly et al, 2014;Frazão et al, 2014;Stelzenm et al, 2013;Calado et al, 2010).…”