2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of a dark fermentation effluent in a microalgal-based biorefinery for the production of high-added value omega-3 fatty acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been shown that using birch and spruce hydrolysates as a glucose source, P. tricornutum generated 3.11-and 3.2-times higher EPA productivity, respectively, compared to photoautotrophic cultivation [21]. Another significant candidate is the heterotrophic marine microalgal species Crypthecodinium cohnii, which has been used for commercial production of DHA [168][169][170][171][172][173][174]. C. cohnii is unique due to DHA being almost the only PUFA present in its lipid profile, and DHA content can be up to 65% of the total fatty acids [175].…”
Section: Oleaginous Microalgae and Diatomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been shown that using birch and spruce hydrolysates as a glucose source, P. tricornutum generated 3.11-and 3.2-times higher EPA productivity, respectively, compared to photoautotrophic cultivation [21]. Another significant candidate is the heterotrophic marine microalgal species Crypthecodinium cohnii, which has been used for commercial production of DHA [168][169][170][171][172][173][174]. C. cohnii is unique due to DHA being almost the only PUFA present in its lipid profile, and DHA content can be up to 65% of the total fatty acids [175].…”
Section: Oleaginous Microalgae and Diatomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T66 was cultivated on single VFAs (C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, and C6), which showed that this strain could not utilize C3, C5, and C6 as a substrate if provided at >2 g/L; whereas C2 and C4 could be used efficiently at up to 40 g/L ( Patel et al, 2020c ). The freshwater microalgae C. protothecoides cannot utilize more than 2 g/L of total VFAs ( Fei et al, 2015 ); while some marine microalgae can easily assimilate 30 g/L of acetic acid, 10 g/L of propionate, and 15 g/L of butyric acid ( Chalima et al, 2019 ). C. cohnii was cultivated on various VFAs (C2, C3, and C4) at an initial concentration ranging from 5 to 50 g/L; the highest biomass was synthesized on 30 g/L of acetate, 10 g/L of propionate, and 15 g/L of butyrate, while any further increase in the concentration of these substrates caused growth inhibition ( Chalima et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The freshwater microalgae C. protothecoides cannot utilize more than 2 g/L of total VFAs ( Fei et al, 2015 ); while some marine microalgae can easily assimilate 30 g/L of acetic acid, 10 g/L of propionate, and 15 g/L of butyric acid ( Chalima et al, 2019 ). C. cohnii was cultivated on various VFAs (C2, C3, and C4) at an initial concentration ranging from 5 to 50 g/L; the highest biomass was synthesized on 30 g/L of acetate, 10 g/L of propionate, and 15 g/L of butyrate, while any further increase in the concentration of these substrates caused growth inhibition ( Chalima et al, 2019 ). Therefore, it might be possible that the VFAs mixture provided here to SR21 and Cohnii was converted into lipid-free biomass but was not enough to synthesize any lipids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effluent filtrate obtained from the anaerobic digestion of organic wastes was used as a suitable medium for biomass and lipid production. The same effluent was used before to assess the growth of Crypthecodinium cohnii , a microalgae, that was able to deplete the organic acid content of the effluent after 60 h of fed-batch cultivation [ 53 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%