2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of energy flow modelling in life cycle assessment of electric vehicle battery repurposing: Evaluation of multi-use cases and comparison of circular business models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that battery repurposing can achieve significant carbon emission benefits, but that there are clear break-even points in terms of remaining storage capacity and module retention rate at the end of the first life. Still on the topic of end-of-life repurposing for second life applications, Schulz-Mönninghoff et al (2021) turned their attention to how to correctly take into account the combination of different battery storage applications in multi-use second life scenarios. A novel life cycle assessment framework was proposed, and its application to a German case study was tested.…”
Section: Recent Developments and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that battery repurposing can achieve significant carbon emission benefits, but that there are clear break-even points in terms of remaining storage capacity and module retention rate at the end of the first life. Still on the topic of end-of-life repurposing for second life applications, Schulz-Mönninghoff et al (2021) turned their attention to how to correctly take into account the combination of different battery storage applications in multi-use second life scenarios. A novel life cycle assessment framework was proposed, and its application to a German case study was tested.…”
Section: Recent Developments and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current studies find quite diverging battery impacts (Ellingsen et al, 2017;Peters et al, 2017;Peters and Weil, 2018). This is due to the use of different data and assumptions on battery performance and compositions (Mohr et al, 2020), battery production processes, geographical scope (Kelly et al, 2020), and life cycle inventory (LCI) information (Ciez and Whitacre, 2019;Spangenberger et al, 2018), and environmental impact assessment methodologies (Schulz-Mönninghoff et al, 2021), amongst others. All these factors can lead to questionable conclusions on the magnitude of environmental impacts of battery production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The replacement rates (R) of the LIB cells and modules are assumed to be 10%. 10 LCA details for operating a battery are provided in Section S4.…”
Section: ■ Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%