Integration of featural information in speech perception.

Oden, Gregg C.; Massaro, Dominic W.

doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.172

Cited by 345 publications

(315 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

306

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This trend is evident for many types of models, including both connectionist models (e.g. the TRACE and MERGE models of speech perception; see McClelland & Elman, 1986;Norris, McQueen & Cutler 2000) and algebraic statistical models (e.g., the FLMP and LIM models of information integration; Oden & Massaro, 1978;N. Anderson, 1981;Navarro, Myung, Pitt & W. Kim, in press).…”

Section: Data-fitting: a Local Model Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Consider the task of distinguishing between Oden and Massaro's (1978) Fuzzy Logic Model of Perception (FLMP) and Anderson's (1981) Linear Integration Model (LIM), which are primarily concerned with questions of stimulus identification. A classic example is the perception of speech when participants see and hear a talker speak a syllable.…”

Section: Information Integration Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing the distinguishability of models and the informativeness of data

Navarro

Pitt

Myung

2004

Cognitive Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Data-fitting: a Local Model Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Information Integration Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the distinguishability of models and the informativeness of data

Navarro

Pitt

Myung

2004

Cognitive Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The intellectual roots of Combination Theory can be traced back at least as far as the fuzzy logical model of perception (Oden & Massaro, 1978;Thompson & Massaro, 1989) and featureintegration theory (Treisman & Gelade, 1980). One formal instantiation of Combination Theory within categorization research is Lamberts's extension to the GCM (Generalized Context Model; Nosofsky, 1984), the EGCM (Extended Generalized Context Model; Lamberts, 1995).…”

Section: Combination Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Combination or Differentiation? Two theories of processing order in classification

Wills

Inkster

Milton

2015

Cognitive Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Does cognition begin with an undifferentiated stimulus whole, which can be divided into distinct attributes if time and cognitive resources allow (Differentiation Theory)? Or does it begin with the attributes, which are combined if time and cognitive resources allow (Combination Theory)?Across psychology, use of the terms analytic and non-analytic imply that Differentiation Theory is correct -if cognition begins with the attributes, then synthesis, rather than analysis, is the more appropriate chemical analogy. We re-examined four classic studies of the effects of time pressure, incidental training, and concurrent load on classification and category learning (Kemler Nelson, 1984;Smith & Kemler Nelson, 1984;Smith & Shapiro, 1989;Ward, 1983). These studies are typically interpreted as supporting Differentiation Theory over Combination Theory, while more recent work in classification (Milton, Longmore & Wills, 2008, et seq.) supports the opposite conclusion. Across seven experiments, replication and re-analysis of the four classic studies revealed that they do not support Differentiation Theory over Combination Theory -two experiments support Combination Theory over Differentiation Theory, and the remainder are compatible with both accounts. We conclude that Combination Theory provides a parsimonious account of both classic and more recent work in this area. The presented data do not require Differentiation Theory, nor a Combination-Differentiation hybrid account.

show abstract

“…One member of the class counts two stages in the perceptual process: a first stage in which, according to principles that apply to the way we hear all sounds, the auditory appearances of the acoustic patterns are registered, followed by a second stage in which, by an act of sorting or matching to prototypes, phonetic labels are affixed (Crowder & Morton, 1969;Fujisaki & Kawashima, 1970;Oden & Massaro, 1978;Pisoni, 1973). Just why such different acoustic patterns as the rising and falling transitions of our example deserve the same label is not explicitly rationalized, it being accounted, presumably, a characteristic of the language that the processes of sorting or matching are able to manage.…”

Section: Auditory Theories and The Accounts They Providementioning

confidence: 99%

The motor theory of speech perception revised

1985

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A motor theory of speech perception, initially proposed to account for results of early experiments with synthetic speech, is now extensively revised to accommodate recent findings, and to relate the assumptions of the theory to those that might be made about other perceptual modes. According to the revised theory, phonetic information is perceived in a biologically distinct system, a 'module' specialized to detect the intended gestures of the speaker that are the basis for phonetic categories. Built into the structure of this module is the unique but lawful relationship between the gestures and the acoustic patterns in which they are variously overlapped. In consequence, the module causes perception of phonetic structure without translation from preliminary auditory impressions. Thus, it is comparable to such other modules as the one that enables an animal to localize sound. Peculiar to the phonetic module are the relation between perception and production it incorporates and the fact that it must compete with other modules for the same stimulus variations.

show abstract

Integration of featural information in speech perception.

Cited by 345 publications

References 34 publications

Assessing the distinguishability of models and the informativeness of data

Assessing the distinguishability of models and the informativeness of data

Combination or Differentiation? Two theories of processing order in classification

The motor theory of speech perception revised

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About