2018
DOI: 10.1117/1.jrs.12.015023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of heterogeneous features for remote sensing scene classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SPM [14], LDA [17], PLSA [61], S-UFL [62], SIFT+BoVW [63], and RF [64] are all high-resolution remote sensing scene classification methods based on middle-level visual features, and their accuracy is mostly lower than that of deep learning methods, let alone the methods of low-level visual features. The method of features integration [65] fuses low-level visual features with middle-level visual features to improve the accuracy of scene classification, but the accuracy is still lower than the method proposed in this paper. Because there is a semantic gap between low-level visual features and scene semantic categories, the scene classification methods based on low-level visual features often fail to achieve good results.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Test Results On the Siri-whu Datasetmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SPM [14], LDA [17], PLSA [61], S-UFL [62], SIFT+BoVW [63], and RF [64] are all high-resolution remote sensing scene classification methods based on middle-level visual features, and their accuracy is mostly lower than that of deep learning methods, let alone the methods of low-level visual features. The method of features integration [65] fuses low-level visual features with middle-level visual features to improve the accuracy of scene classification, but the accuracy is still lower than the method proposed in this paper. Because there is a semantic gap between low-level visual features and scene semantic categories, the scene classification methods based on low-level visual features often fail to achieve good results.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Test Results On the Siri-whu Datasetmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Traditional methods SPM [14] 77.69±1.01 LDA [17] 60.32±1.20 PLSA [61] 89.60±0.89 S-UFL [62] 74.84 SIFT+BoVW [63] 75.63 RF [64] 89.29 Features integration [65] 88…”
Section: Methods Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i κ and i α reveal respectively the -th i basic kernel function and its weight coefficient. A popular kernel, called Gaussian radial basic function (RBF), is employed as the basic kernels in this paper, for it can handle the non-linear mapping between the class labels and features robustly [28]. A RBF is defined as:…”
Section: Multi-kernel Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good features that have good discriminability for different categories of image scenes can maximize inter-class differences and at the same time, minimize intra-class variations [6]. Many methods have been proposed to extract various features for RS images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, how to properly select those features is still one of the main research topics in the areas of pattern recognition and machine learning. As pointed out in [5,6,8,17], rather than adding features with similar attributes, one should combine those with complementary information in order to achieve better classification performance. In addition, the heterogeneous features fusion strategy is another key step to construct the final informative representation for RS image scenes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%