2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell with metal oxide charge storage material into photoelectrochemical capacitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ECSE of a PSC is measured by performing a charge-discharge experiment: during the charging phase, the solar cell is exposed to light, which charges the initially empty supercapacitor. After a certain amount of time, the charging is stopped and the supercapacitor is discharged, either at constant current [12] or into a given load [13]. The ECSE is then defined as the ratio of electrical energy discharged from the super-capacitor over the light energy received by the solar cell during the charging period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ECSE of a PSC is measured by performing a charge-discharge experiment: during the charging phase, the solar cell is exposed to light, which charges the initially empty supercapacitor. After a certain amount of time, the charging is stopped and the supercapacitor is discharged, either at constant current [12] or into a given load [13]. The ECSE is then defined as the ratio of electrical energy discharged from the super-capacitor over the light energy received by the solar cell during the charging period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of the charging phase and the incident light power influence the measured ECSE value of a PSC: as the supercapacitor is charging, its voltage increases, which modifies the output power of the solar cell over time [9,12]. For a given light power, each system thus displays a maximum ECSE value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2011, another improvement leap occurred for a DSSC, with an improvement in its efficiency up to 11% or 12.3% for certain prototypes [10] relative to the 7.1% conversion rate of the first DSSC [6]. An improved efficiency DSSC composed of co-sensitizers of donorep-bridgeeacceptor zinc porphyrin dye (YD2-o-C8) and donorep-bridgeeacceptor (DepeA) with Co (II/III) tris(bipyridyl)e based redox electrolyte had an efficiency of 12.3% due to its light absorbing ability over the whole visible range, in addition to the presence of long alkoxy group chains, which retarded the electron recombination process [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved efficiency DSSC composed of co-sensitizers of donorep-bridgeeacceptor zinc porphyrin dye (YD2-o-C8) and donorep-bridgeeacceptor (DepeA) with Co (II/III) tris(bipyridyl)e based redox electrolyte had an efficiency of 12.3% due to its light absorbing ability over the whole visible range, in addition to the presence of long alkoxy group chains, which retarded the electron recombination process [11]. The most common DSSC prototype was composed of ruthenium (Ru)-based dye adhering to anatase (TiO 2 ) films with iodide/triiodide (I À /I 3 À ) couple liquid, semi-liquid, or redox conducting electrolytes [10]. Its high conversion efficiency could be attributed to the large surface active area of porous titania film, which increases the amount of dye adsorption [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, a DSSC was combined with an electrochemical capacitor of hydrous ruthenium oxide electrodes and excellent performance characteristics were shown [25]. However, to the best of our knowledge, to date, an amalgamation of a quantum dot solar cell (QDSC) and a carbon based supercapacitor has hardly been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%