Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Deconvolution transforms variable rate pressure data into a constant rate initial drawdown with a duration equal to the total duration of the test. It yields directly the corresponding pressure derivative, normalized to a unit rate. It is not a new interpretation method, but a new tool to process pressure and rate data in order to obtain more pressure data to interpret with conventional techniques. Although deconvolution has received much attention since 2001 following the publication of a stable algorithm by von Schroeter, Hollaender, and Gringarten, its use by practicing engineers is still limited. One reason is limited access to the algorithm, which had only recently become available in commercial well test analysis software products. The other is concerns on how deconvolution should be used and how reliable it is. As a result, few examples of practical applications of well test deconvolution are available in the literature. This paper illustrates various uses of deconvolution in tests of short and long durations. Examples include DST's with erroneous rates, which deconvolution is able to correct; and data from permanent downhole pressure gauges in vertical and horizontal wells, where deconvolution shows compartmentalization and recharge from other layers, which could not be seen in the original data. Recommendations on how to perform deconvolution and how to verify deconvolution results are also provided. It is hoped that this paper will encourage well test interpreters to use deconvolution confidently as part of the well test analysis process.
Deconvolution transforms variable rate pressure data into a constant rate initial drawdown with a duration equal to the total duration of the test. It yields directly the corresponding pressure derivative, normalized to a unit rate. It is not a new interpretation method, but a new tool to process pressure and rate data in order to obtain more pressure data to interpret with conventional techniques. Although deconvolution has received much attention since 2001 following the publication of a stable algorithm by von Schroeter, Hollaender, and Gringarten, its use by practicing engineers is still limited. One reason is limited access to the algorithm, which had only recently become available in commercial well test analysis software products. The other is concerns on how deconvolution should be used and how reliable it is. As a result, few examples of practical applications of well test deconvolution are available in the literature. This paper illustrates various uses of deconvolution in tests of short and long durations. Examples include DST's with erroneous rates, which deconvolution is able to correct; and data from permanent downhole pressure gauges in vertical and horizontal wells, where deconvolution shows compartmentalization and recharge from other layers, which could not be seen in the original data. Recommendations on how to perform deconvolution and how to verify deconvolution results are also provided. It is hoped that this paper will encourage well test interpreters to use deconvolution confidently as part of the well test analysis process.
The E-M field is a gas reservoir that has been under production for nearly a decade. This paper presents the effort of the team to revise and improve the sub-surface model to delineate new drilling targets. Closure of the field to the east was uncertain, but critical to the field development plan. Inversion of the seismic data created an absolute acoustic impedance cube and a derived effective porosity cube. Attributes were extracted from each of the various seismic data, using direct and interval extractions following the interpreted surfaces. Careful inspection of the seismic amplitude in cross section revealed a flat spot, indicating a potential fluid contact. This feature was confirmed in several of the extracted attributes which were then used to constrain an iterative depth conversion. Fault interpretations in time were then adjusted to match the new depth horizons creating enechelon faults in a fashion analogous to surface outcrops observed in the Cape Town region.Uncertainty also exists with respect to the vertical isolation of the reservoirs. Log responses record a thin shale, below seismic vertical resolution, in all of the drilled wells. However, the areal extent of the shale is unknown, and vertical communication is a possibility. Stochastic representations of the potential shale extents were introduced into the dynamic fluid-flow simulation, and fed through an experimental design to test the impact on vertical connectivity. Using a proxy model from these results a Monte-Carlo simulation provided a probability distribution for the production response.The methods presented here are applicable to fields wherever sharp acoustic impedance contrasts exist between fluid types, particularly in gas reservoirs or reservoirs with an existing gas cap. Seismic attributes have refined the depth conversion for the E-M field, and the resulting geomodel provides new drilling targets for the operator.
Production Data Analysis (PDA) has been widely accepted as a valuable analytical tool for well performance evaluation, production forecasting and reservoir characterization. It is fast, practical, and inexpensiveand it can answer many questions about the connected volume to the well, flow regime, average permeability and skin, as well as any boundary within the radius of investigation of the well. It becomes even more important in the case of complex systems such as finely laminated sand reservoirs, or highly heterogeneous multi-stacked reservoirs where sometimes numerical simulation model miscarries in predicting the reservoir performance. Analytical approaches for PDA are variants and require different levels of details in the input. Each is established based on certain assumptions and concepts, and comes with specific limitations. Despite overlap amongst the various methods, each has an advantage in particular application over the others. Therefore, one must be vigilant to use each method for the right purposes in addition to confirm the results and unveil possible uncertainties through using several different methods. This paper integrates basic production and reservoir data through different platforms and methods. Diagnostic plots, General Material Balance (GMB), Pressure Transient Analysis (PTA), deconvolution, nodal analysis, Rate Transient Analysis (RTA), and Flowing Material Balance (FMB) are extensively used to explain the reservoir behavior through PDA. It validates RTA and FMB as an approach for reservoir characterization and reserve estimation without the need to shut-in the well, and defer the production. The benefit of continuously monitoring Flowing Bottom Hole Pressure (FBHP) using Permanent Downhole Gauge (PDG) and applying deconvolution to detect well interference and reservoir boundaries is also discussed. We have also looked at the limitation and advantage of each method and how the integration of those can provide a full picture and enhance the results. We have studied several gas fields. The results of analysis provided an accurate perception and understanding of reservoir behavior and characteristics, well interaction and interference, potential for infill wells, production issues and well constraints, estimation of the connected volume, and eventually led to generation of a reliable analytical reservoir model for the production forecast. The estimated connected volume was tested and proved to be reliable based on infill drilling. The workflow focuses on examining the data quality, confirming the validity of work, and achieving the maximum possible insight through integration of different analytical methods. An integrated workflow is introduced for PDAand successfully applied on different cases of highly heterogeneous conventional gas reservoirs with huge complexities. The paper demonstrates one of the case study as example. The proposed workflow shows to be very powerful particularly when large volume of data from pressure downhole gauges (PDG) is available. It saves significant time for the study team in determining the potential value of a project.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.