Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

On 25 September, 2015, world leaders met at the United Nations in New York, where they adopted the Sustainable Development Goals. These 17 goals and 169 targets set out an agenda for sustainable development for all nations that embraces economic growth, social inclusion, and environmental protection. Now, the agenda moves from agreeing the goals to implementing and ultimately achieving them. Across the goals, 42 targets focus on means of implementation, and the final goal, Goal 17, is entirely devoted to means of implementation. However, these implementation targets are largely silent about interlinkages and interdependencies among goals. This leaves open the possibility of perverse outcomes and unrealised synergies. We demonstrate that there must be greater attention on interlinkages in three areas: across sectors (e.g., finance, agriculture, energy, and transport), across societal actors (local authorities, government agencies, private sector, and civil society), and between and among low, medium and high income countries. Drawing on a global sustainability science and practice perspective, we provide seven recommendations to improve these interlinkages at both global and national levels, in relation to the UN’s categories of means of implementation: finance, technology, capacity building, trade, policy coherence, partnerships, and, finally, data, monitoring and accountability.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Resources for Sustainable Economic Development: A Framework for Evaluating Infrastructure System Alternatives

“…The agenda sketched in this paper can provide useful input for both global dialog and community engagement. Stafford-Smith et al [67] call for the Sustainable Development Goals to progress from setting a list of targets to providing the kinds of inputs needed for implementation on the ground. As the first step, they see the need to strengthen various linkages among the many individual SDGs.…”

Applying the SDGs to cities: business as usual or new dawn?

“…The goals and associated indicators are not ranked or weighted and some are even contradictory. This suggests that decision makers need to evaluate on a case-by-case basis what is deemed more important, as has been suggested by some research [84,92], especially in the context of implementing the SDGs at local level [28,43,46,48,49].…”

“…The SDGs comprise 17 goals covering different aspects of sustainable development, as defined by the Brundtland commission [27,28]. These goals in turn consist of 168 targets and several hundred indicators (UN I-AEG on SDG indicators, 2016) to assess progress in meeting the goals 1 .…”

“…Especially since the introduction of the SDGs, there is a growing body of literature that deals with various aspects, either regarding the evolution of the SDGs, historically but also forwardlooking [27,31,32], as to the degree to which the SDGs themselves, or the way they are structured, can facilitate the progression to a more sustainable development [27,28,[33][34][35][36], or aspects concerning the applicability of the SDGs and their associated indicators, on different levels.…”

Social Perception of Rural Tourism Impact: A Case Study

“…Sen [16] has already shown how development and local territory go hand in hand. Some research establishes a common agreement on the main elements local development must cover, such as finance, technology, capacity building, trade, policy coherence, partnerships and, finally, data, monitoring and accountability [17]. The term 'local' applied to development is being progressively replaced by the term 'territory', because of the growing importance of cultural and institutional factors in economic dynamics.…”