2012
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210415109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative analysis of the zinc finger transcription factor Lame duck in the Drosophila myogenic gene regulatory network

Abstract: Contemporary high-throughput technologies permit the rapid identification of transcription factor (TF) target genes on a genome-wide scale, yet the functional significance of TFs requires knowledge of target gene expression patterns, cooperating TFs, and cis-regulatory element (CRE) structures. Here we investigated the myogenic regulatory network downstream of the Drosophila zinc finger TF Lame duck (Lmd) by combining both previously published and newly performed genomic data sets, including ChIP sequencing (C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These TFs spanned multiple families, including ZFPs. We performed a similar assessment of our new ZFP recognition motifs using recently published ChIP data for nine factors (Chinmo, Disco, Lmd, Pho, Phol, Sens, Shn, Sna, and Ttk) (MacArthur et al 2009;Schuettengruber et al 2009;Negre et al 2010;Busser et al 2012). We evaluated binding potential to each genomic segment using Stubb scores, which reflect motif frequency (Hallikas et al 2006;Robasky and Bulyk 2011 (Kazemian et al 2010(Kazemian et al , 2011.…”
Section: Predictive Value Of Zfp Recognition Motifsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These TFs spanned multiple families, including ZFPs. We performed a similar assessment of our new ZFP recognition motifs using recently published ChIP data for nine factors (Chinmo, Disco, Lmd, Pho, Phol, Sens, Shn, Sna, and Ttk) (MacArthur et al 2009;Schuettengruber et al 2009;Negre et al 2010;Busser et al 2012). We evaluated binding potential to each genomic segment using Stubb scores, which reflect motif frequency (Hallikas et al 2006;Robasky and Bulyk 2011 (Kazemian et al 2010(Kazemian et al , 2011.…”
Section: Predictive Value Of Zfp Recognition Motifsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modulation of Lmd activity occurs at the post-transcriptional level, in part by regulation of its subcellular localisation (Duan and Nguyen, 2006). Recent analysis has identified genomic regions bound by Lmd that are also co-occupied by key regulators such as Twist, Tinman and Mef2 combinatorially regulating the expression of FCM-and FC-specific genes in the embryonic mesoderm (Busser et al, 2012). Interestingly, recent work indicates a role for the E3 ubiquitin ligase Mind bomb 2 (Mib2) in the regulation of Lmd protein levels (Carrasco-Rando and Ruiz-Gómez, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, we determined if the Deficiency/Mutant offspring were either lethal, or if they showed a behavioral deficit consistent with the known expression pattern of the gene. Specifically, we predicted that knockouts of Act57B , CG1674 , CG9336 and CG14687 would be lethal based upon their broad expression in the mesoderm during embryonic development [1619]. By contrast, we predicted that knockout of TpnC4 would be flightless based upon its expression in the adult flight muscles [20], and that knockout of Act79B would result in failure to jump, based upon its expression in the adult jump muscles ([21,22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%