2017
DOI: 10.5296/ijhrs.v7i3.11673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative Leadership is a Precursor of Engagement of Bank Employees in Pakistan

Abstract: The purpose of this study was twofold: to examine the relationship and determine the predictive power of integrative leadership on employee engagement. To achieve the mentioned objectives, the quantitative research method was employed and data was collected through survey questionnaire from 1000 operational employees of all 21 private banks in Pakistan. The sample of 819 respondents was utilized for final analysis. Two stage sampling method was performed; non-probability sampling and stratified random sampling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, 3.30%, 4.40%, and 3.30% used May, Gilson and Harter's ( 2004) tools (Mani, 2011), Rich et al's (2010) tools (He et al, 2013), Khan's (1990) engagement scales (Imam & Shafique, 2014) respectively. Furthermore, precisely 12.09% applied others' measurement tools of employee engagement such as Thomas's (2007) tools (Dajani, 2015); Lee's (2012) scale (Hassan, Hassan, & Shoaib, 2014); Fine et al's (2010) scale (Shaikh & Akaraborworn, 2017); Wellins, Bernthal and Phelps's ( 2004) scale (Muduli et al, 2016); Robinson et al's (2004) scale (Busse & Regenberg, 2018); Towers Watson's scale (2010) (Besieux et al, 2015).…”
Section: Measurement Scales Of Employee Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, 3.30%, 4.40%, and 3.30% used May, Gilson and Harter's ( 2004) tools (Mani, 2011), Rich et al's (2010) tools (He et al, 2013), Khan's (1990) engagement scales (Imam & Shafique, 2014) respectively. Furthermore, precisely 12.09% applied others' measurement tools of employee engagement such as Thomas's (2007) tools (Dajani, 2015); Lee's (2012) scale (Hassan, Hassan, & Shoaib, 2014); Fine et al's (2010) scale (Shaikh & Akaraborworn, 2017); Wellins, Bernthal and Phelps's ( 2004) scale (Muduli et al, 2016); Robinson et al's (2004) scale (Busse & Regenberg, 2018); Towers Watson's scale (2010) (Besieux et al, 2015).…”
Section: Measurement Scales Of Employee Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%