2011
DOI: 10.2217/imt.10.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrin Antagonists for Transplant Immunosuppression: Panacea or Peril?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the risk-benefit calculus of using efalizumab may be notably different in the setting of transplantation compared to psoriasis. If a combined regimen of belatacept and efalizumab could avert graft loss from CoB-resistant heterologous immune responses, it might justify a nominal absolute risk of PML (56). Future non-human primate trials with anti-LFA-1 and belatacept immunosuppression may better evaluate the clinical potential of this promising regimen of combined costimulatory and LFA-1 blockade, and to define its potential risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the risk-benefit calculus of using efalizumab may be notably different in the setting of transplantation compared to psoriasis. If a combined regimen of belatacept and efalizumab could avert graft loss from CoB-resistant heterologous immune responses, it might justify a nominal absolute risk of PML (56). Future non-human primate trials with anti-LFA-1 and belatacept immunosuppression may better evaluate the clinical potential of this promising regimen of combined costimulatory and LFA-1 blockade, and to define its potential risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control of memory alloreactive T cells, whether having arisen by heterologous immunity or other means, by blocking adhesion molecules has successfully been demonstrated in non-human primate transplantation models. Antibodies directed against lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA1) (efalizumab), VLA4 (natalizumab) and the LFA3–immunoglobulin fusion protein (Alefacept) effectively prevented acute rejection of kidney or islet transplants in mice and non-human primates but also diminished protective memory to subsequent infections 95-98 , underscoring the potential limitation of this approach. Indeed, efalizumab and natalizumab have been associated with increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), and efalizumab has been withdrawn from the US market 98 .…”
Section: Implications For Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibodies directed against lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA1) (efalizumab), VLA4 (natalizumab) and the LFA3–immunoglobulin fusion protein (Alefacept) effectively prevented acute rejection of kidney or islet transplants in mice and non-human primates but also diminished protective memory to subsequent infections 95-98 , underscoring the potential limitation of this approach. Indeed, efalizumab and natalizumab have been associated with increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), and efalizumab has been withdrawn from the US market 98 . These infectious concerns prompt the consideration of alternative approaches to minimize the impact of alloreactive memory T cells, such as through the selection of donor-recipient pairs with minimal pre-transplant memory donor-specific T cell reactivity 17 .…”
Section: Implications For Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, anti-TCR mAbs have been largely neglected in clinical use, and anti-LFA1 mAb was recently removed from the market in 2009 for its risk of reactivation of latent JC virus infection [45], [46]. Recently, there has been renewed interest in the use of anti-LFA1 mAb in short-term settings or in combinations that can reduce its dosing regimen [47]. Our results indicate that the combination of these two agents provides a significant benefit for prolonging skin allograft survival in mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%