2004
DOI: 10.1108/13683040410524757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intellectual capital – does it create or destroy value?

Abstract: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/ authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
675
0
95

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 536 publications
(783 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
13
675
0
95
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods to value intellectual capital include Economic Value Added (EVA) and the Balanced Score Card (BSC). Pulic (2004) argues that EVA focus on the efficiency of just one resource, capital employed and therefore this method can not be a valid measuring system for the new economy. The descriptive nature of the BSC and the lack of comparability in the non-monetary indicators that is favors, make BSC an in adequate valuation method for intellectual capital (Daum, 2002).…”
Section: Intellectual Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other methods to value intellectual capital include Economic Value Added (EVA) and the Balanced Score Card (BSC). Pulic (2004) argues that EVA focus on the efficiency of just one resource, capital employed and therefore this method can not be a valid measuring system for the new economy. The descriptive nature of the BSC and the lack of comparability in the non-monetary indicators that is favors, make BSC an in adequate valuation method for intellectual capital (Daum, 2002).…”
Section: Intellectual Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in the IC field it is commonly understood that traditional financial measurement systems are inadequate for today's businesses (Pulic 2004). However, a review of the literature on intellectual capital shows that measuring intellectual capital is difficult and challenging.…”
Section: Intellectual Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on the earlier research (Pulic, 2000;M'Pherson and Pike, 2001;Pulic, 2004;Andriessen, 2004) and, in particular, the critical analyses of the findings put forward by those studies, the EIC methodological framework indicates the elements needed for the calculation. In addition to this, we want to point out that human resources are the most important factor of the business success of an enterprise in the knowledge economy era.…”
Section: Efficiency In the Use Of Structural And Relational Capital (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAIC model adopted in this research is elaborated from the original work of Pulic (2004) and modified or extended version by Kehelwalatenna (2016), Nimtrakoon (2015), Ulum et al (2014), and Vishnu and Vijay (2014). There are (1) Figure 1 represents the schematic diagram of the construction of VAIC.…”
Section: Ato = Total Revenue/total Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%