2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10824-009-9095-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intellectual property rights and U.S. information goods exports: the role of imitation threat

Abstract: IPR, Information goods trade, Threat-of-imitation, F13, O24, Q17, Z11,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this is not necessarily inconsistent with learning by exporting: as indicated above, consistent exposure to export markets makes it more likely that hightech SMEs produce new-to-market products, and firms which are already highly innovative may find that an 'export-dipping' approach is appropriate for them at this stage of their lifecycle. This may also be a result of UK high-tech SMEs being concerned (perhaps from past experience) that their innovative product will be easily copied by foreign competitors due to low levels of intellectual property protection that exist in some foreign markets (Smith 2001(Smith , 2002Liu and Lin 2005;Weng et al 2009). This can cause high-tech firms that have a high proportion of radically innovative products in their portfolio to avoid exporting to such countries at least during the early stages of the introduction of such products to the market.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this is not necessarily inconsistent with learning by exporting: as indicated above, consistent exposure to export markets makes it more likely that hightech SMEs produce new-to-market products, and firms which are already highly innovative may find that an 'export-dipping' approach is appropriate for them at this stage of their lifecycle. This may also be a result of UK high-tech SMEs being concerned (perhaps from past experience) that their innovative product will be easily copied by foreign competitors due to low levels of intellectual property protection that exist in some foreign markets (Smith 2001(Smith , 2002Liu and Lin 2005;Weng et al 2009). This can cause high-tech firms that have a high proportion of radically innovative products in their portfolio to avoid exporting to such countries at least during the early stages of the introduction of such products to the market.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPP refers to the intensity of protection of industrial intellectual property rights closely related to corporate innovation and competition by enterprises or governments (Weng et al , 2009). Common categories of the intellectual property comprise patents, trademarks, copyrights, design rights and technical or commercial information (trade secrets), among others (Hagedoorn and Zobel, 2015; Zhang et al , 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literature also recognizes the incidences of imitations in the destination country as a threat to export entry from the developed region (Smith 1999(Smith , 2001(Smith , 2002Weng et al 2009). In this study, we use a continuous measure on threat of imitation to test the hypothesis.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 98%