PurposeRespiratory‐guided computed tomography (CT) typically employs breathing motion surrogates to feed image reconstruction or visual breathing coaching. Our study aimed to assess the impact of table movements and table sag on the breathing curves recorded in four‐dimensional (4D) CT and deep‐inspiration breath‐hold (DIBH) CT.MethodsFor breathing curve measurements, static and dynamic phantom scenarios were used. Breathing curves were recorded using three different surrogate systems and the impact of table sag due to weights of up to 130 kg was analyzed and compared to a non‐weighted setting, respectively. The calibration procedure of the system used as an input for the visual coaching device used for clinical DIBH CT scans was adapted. We evaluated corresponding breathing curves acquired during DIBH and 4DCT scans of altogether 70 patients using various stability metrics.ResultsThe various surrogate systems showed consistent table sag measurements below 4 mm, even under loads up to 130 kg, compared to a reference scan conducted without additional weight. Higher weight loads were related to steeper table sag fall‐offs towards the deepest table position. For DIBH CT scans, the visual guidance was heavily affected by artifacts. This resulted in breathing threshold limits, which could not be achieved by 48% (n = 21) of the, respectively, examined patients. Using the new calibration workflow, the baseline drift was compensated better and 90% (n = 20) of the addressed patients stayed within the thresholds. The evaluated table sag in clinical 4DCT scans (n = 29) stayed below 3 mm compared to the non‐weighted situation.ConclusionTable movement and sag can impact breathing curves recorded by different surrogate systems. Correcting table movement and sag artifacts is crucial for reliable breathing curve acquisition in respiratory‐guided CT.