2018 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iccons.2018.8663065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Alzheimer's Detector Using Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Around 53% of studies attempted to offer a model that can classify MCI and normal controls from AD. Classification of AD, MCI, and normal controls was also studied extensively (Khan et al, 2019 ; Puranik et al, 2019 ; Li Y et al, 2021 ; Yang and Hong, 2021 ). Detection (Choi et al, 2020 ), Classification (Cheng et al, 2017 ), and autoencoder (Oh et al, 2019 ) methods were utilized to differentiate MCI from AD and/or normal controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Around 53% of studies attempted to offer a model that can classify MCI and normal controls from AD. Classification of AD, MCI, and normal controls was also studied extensively (Khan et al, 2019 ; Puranik et al, 2019 ; Li Y et al, 2021 ; Yang and Hong, 2021 ). Detection (Choi et al, 2020 ), Classification (Cheng et al, 2017 ), and autoencoder (Oh et al, 2019 ) methods were utilized to differentiate MCI from AD and/or normal controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…finetuned convolution and FC layers for AlexNet and GoogLeNet architectures pre-trained on ImageNet dataset. Several classifiers were added to the end of FC layers and obtained an accuracy of 88-100% for different classifiers such as KNN, Naïve Bayes, SVM, and Logistic Regression on top of AlexNet and GoogLeNet Liang et al (2018),Eitel et al (2019),Khan et al (2019),Oh et al (2019),Puranik et al (2019),Ramzan et al (2020),Simon et al (2019),Wu et al (2019),Zhang et al (2021), andOcasio andDuong (2021). also utilized this approach and obtained competitive results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the small sample size of medical images, deep-learning-based diagnosis methods suffer many limitations. In paper (Puranik et al, 2018 ; Taheri and Naima, 2019 ), the classification accuracy is achieved by using 2D slices of neuroimaging data as input of the CNN, which is based on slice-level classification. In order to acquire the subject-level classification accuracy, we integrate all slice features of each subject.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD and LMCI vs. EMCI, but the classification task excluded EMCI vs. NC. Puranik et al ( 2018 ) employed a 2DCNN model with transfer learning technique to classify AD, EMCI, and NC and obtained an accuracy of 98.41%. However, the inputs of the CNN are the 2D slices of fMRI images, which means that the classification task is not based on subject-level, deviating clinical needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, deep learning techniques have enabled medical imaging scientists to predict various stages of Alzheimer's disease [19], [20]. Using robust computational resources such as cloud computing, the scientists could implement end-to-end prediction pipelines to preprocess medical imaging data, build complex deep learning models, and post-process results to assist medical doctors to distinguish early-stage MCI brains from highly correlated normal aging images [21]- [24]. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) inspired by the human visual system form such pipelines' core image classification component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%