2018
DOI: 10.30632/pjv59n6-2018a5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Logging Lithological Interpretation With Convolution Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work mainly focuses on multi-class classification, which might result in lower prediction accuracy. Zhu et al (2018) utilized the waveletdecomposition approach to convert the lithology identification task into a supervised image recognition task. A convolution neural network (CNN) was then used to train the model to classify lithology classes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work mainly focuses on multi-class classification, which might result in lower prediction accuracy. Zhu et al (2018) utilized the waveletdecomposition approach to convert the lithology identification task into a supervised image recognition task. A convolution neural network (CNN) was then used to train the model to classify lithology classes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to petrophysical model-based methods, e.g., Timur-Coats equation and Windland's equation (Leverett, 1941;Timur, 1968), machine-learning approaches obtain better results by fitting more complex relationships between well logs and formation properties. Common machinelearning methods used for well-log interpretation include random forest, feed-forward neural network, and convolutional neural network (CNN) (Collobert and Weston, 2008;Bhattacharya and Mishra., 2018;Zhu et al, 2018;Zhong et al, 2019). However, in almost all previous research, the training data set is formed by lumping data from all available wells and is not adapted to the test set, which implicitly assumes that the measurement error of well logs is stationary, i.e., the statistics of the error do not vary with well locations or depths, and the welllog interpretation is unique, i.e., formation properties can be uniquely determined from a set of well logs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Saporetti et al [ 18 ] adopted an evolutionary parameter tuning strategy, and combined gradient boosting (GB) with differential evolution (DE) to achieve the optimization of super parameters, thereby making the lithology identification more stable. In the study of [ 19 ], the wavelet decomposition was used to construct multi-channel images of logging data, and then the lithology identification problem based on the logging curve was skillfully transformed into an image segmentation problem. Finally, the feasibility of this method was verified by the application in the Daqing oilfield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%