Intelligent Transportation System User Service Selection and Prioritization

Abstract

Thirty-three intelligent transportation system user services are analyzed for 38 criteria through a hybrid model of the disjunctive satisfying method (DSM), a noncompensatory multicriteria decision-making technique, and a compensatory analytic network process (ANP). The DSM reduces the problem size by excluding inappropriate user services; subsequently, the ANP establishes overall relative preferences for selected user services by considering various inner dependencies, interdependencies, and mutual effects among the elements. The electronic payment, travel demand management, and traffic control user services are proposed as the best alternatives for the problem in a developing country.

Sustainability assessment approaches for intelligent transport systems: the state of the art

“…Khademi et al [64] illustrated 33 ITS user services through a hybrid model of the disjunctive satisfying method (DSM) and ANP. The DSM reduces the problem size by excluding inappropriate user services while the ANP establishes overall relative preferences for selected user services by considering various inner dependencies, interdependencies and mutual effects among the elements.…”

“…Most have focused on a combined strategic analysis of supplier choice, technology selection and planning [62][63][64]. Ghaeli et al [65] proposed an integrated project portfolio selection model using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and proven concepts used for portfolio selection in the finance discipline.…”

Analysis of incident costs in a vulnerable sparse rail network – Description and Iran case study

“…), and very low (1), where these intensities yield the relative normalized preferences: very high (0.42), high (0.26), medium (0.16), low (0.1), and very low (0.06) (Khademi et al, 2010). For example, when the importance of "manure, fertilizer, and compost" gain the lowest weight (1), "ores and minerals" receive a medium importance ( 22 3…”

Evaluating Highway Traffic Safety: An Integrated Approach

“…In the transportation field, the AHP has been implemented in numerous applications. The applications include the impacts of transit priority on signal coordination [15], project selection and prioritization of pavement preservation [16], prioritizing network level maintenance of pavement segments [17], assessing options to enhance bicycle and transit integration [18], selection and prioritization of intelligent transportation system user service [19], integration multiple criteria decision making to prioritize transportation [20], assessing asphalt pavement construction quality control [21], analytic minimum impedance surface [22], prioritizing traffic calming projects [23], and determining low volume road standards, long-term needs, and environmental risks [24]. In the area of safety, AHP has been implemented to evaluate railway traffic safety, ship traffic safety, road traffic safety, and work zone safety [9,25].…”