2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03).
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2003.1198933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligibility of modifications to dysarthric speech

Abstract: Dysarthria is a motor speech impairment affecting millions of people. Dysarthric speech can he far less intelligible than that of non-dysarthric speakers, causing significant communication difficulties. The goal of this work is to understand the effect that certain modifications have on the intelligibility of dysarthric speech. These modifications are designed to identify aspects of the speech signal or signal processing that may he especially relevant to the effectiveness of a system that transforms dysarthri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since each speaker in the TORGO database recites the same set of phrases, we achieve frame-by-frame alignment by applying dynamic time warping on corresponding acoustic segments of preannotated speech, and applying the resulting alignment on the raw articulatory data. This is effectively the reverse of the approach suggested by Hosom et al, who propose transforming dysarthric acoustic space to regular acoustic space in order to be made more intelligible [69].…”
Section: B Statistical Transformation Of Articulator Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since each speaker in the TORGO database recites the same set of phrases, we achieve frame-by-frame alignment by applying dynamic time warping on corresponding acoustic segments of preannotated speech, and applying the resulting alignment on the raw articulatory data. This is effectively the reverse of the approach suggested by Hosom et al, who propose transforming dysarthric acoustic space to regular acoustic space in order to be made more intelligible [69].…”
Section: B Statistical Transformation Of Articulator Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iVector of utterance s was calculated as the expectation of the posterior distribution of i given the sufficient statistics of the utterance [Dehak et al 2011]. The main difference between the common formulation of FA [Bishop 2006] and ours is that in the former, the latent variable changes for every frame, whereas in our case, the latent variable is common to the whole utterance [Kenny et al 2007]. …”
Section: Factor Analysis Front-end: Ivector Extractormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These disorders typically limit motor function generally, making other physical interaction (e.g., keyboard) slower, and less desirable than spoken expression [1]. Unfortunately, automatic speech recognition is currently ill-suited to dysarthric speech, rendering such software inaccessible to those who might most benefit from it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%