2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-1007-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity-modulated proton therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and 3D conformal radiotherapy in anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma

Abstract: Essential dose reduction while maintaining equal target volume coverage was observed using PRT, particularly in contralaterally located critical neuronal structures, areas of neurogenesis, and structures of neurocognitive functions. These findings were supported by preliminary clinical results confirming the safety and feasibility of PRT in HGG.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 However, with improved RT target volume delineation, more narrow margin expansion into normal brain, and improved dose distribution of IMRT, the late deficits may be less evident with RT. 20 Data support the association between RT dosimetry and late effects. RT dose per fraction was reported to be a predictor of late neurocognitive deficits in patients with low-grade glioma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…19 However, with improved RT target volume delineation, more narrow margin expansion into normal brain, and improved dose distribution of IMRT, the late deficits may be less evident with RT. 20 Data support the association between RT dosimetry and late effects. RT dose per fraction was reported to be a predictor of late neurocognitive deficits in patients with low-grade glioma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…[8,[10][11][12][13] In previous comparative studies for 3D-CRT and/or IMRT and/or VMAT, preoperative and postoperative MRI, only postoperative MRI, varying clinical target volume margins, varying dose schedules (including simultaneous integrated boost) have been used for target volume delineation. [6][7][8][9]12,[14][15][16][17][18][19] As emphasized in the guidelines for RT for glioblastoma published by the American Society for Radiation Oncology in March 2016, four main target delineations of different cooperative groups (single-phase treatment or two-phase treatment volume, involving or not involving edema) exist, and these are defined by the postoperative MRI but have different target definitions. [2] We aimed to investigate the effects of 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT treatment plans on the doses of OARs, by using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practise (EORTC-ACROP) target delineation, which has not been evaluated previously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adeberg et al compared IM proton therapy (PRT), VMAT, and 3D-CRT treatment plans in 12 patients with high-grade glial tumors. [15] They used a volume definition containing tumor cavity and edema in postoperative MRI. Compared with 3D-CRT and VMAT, PRT showed a statistically significant dose reduction in whole-brain mean dose, brainstem, pituitary gland, contralateral hippocampus, and contralateral subventricular zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially important in children whose brain is very sensitive to irradiation (as discussed above). An essential dose reduction by using PBT compared to conformal radiotherapy was shown particularly in contralaterally located critical neuronal structures (61). Different clinical studies measured superior quality of life, physical, and IQ scores in children with brain tumors receiving PBT compared to those treated with X-rays (6265).…”
Section: Radiation-induced Late Brain Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%