1968
DOI: 10.1063/1.1669845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity Patterns in Absorption and Fluorescence Spectra of Molecular Dimers: A Comparison between the Vibronic and the Born–Oppenheimer Approach

Abstract: On the molecular theory of aqueous electrolyte solutions. III. A comparison between Born-Oppenheimer and McMillan-Mayer levels of descriptionAfter showing in a previous paper that the Born-oppenheimer zeroth-order approximation can produce accurately the vibronic energies of a model of an excited molecular dimer for a wide range of parameters, the same approach is now used to calculate the vibrational patterns in absorption and fluorescence spectra. Two different levels of approximation depending on the degree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under a few assumptions, they could derive exact expressions of the line shapes of the vibronic bands associated with the single mode. In their study, the vibration mode mediates the coupling between two electronic states and induces so called the vibronic intensity borrowing [35][36][37][38]. The same model for a molecular dimer with a single vibrational mode was studied by Friesner and Silbey using an analytic approximation method [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Under a few assumptions, they could derive exact expressions of the line shapes of the vibronic bands associated with the single mode. In their study, the vibration mode mediates the coupling between two electronic states and induces so called the vibronic intensity borrowing [35][36][37][38]. The same model for a molecular dimer with a single vibrational mode was studied by Friesner and Silbey using an analytic approximation method [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%