1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1975.tb03271.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensive and Extensive Peer Behavior: Longitudinal and Cross-sectional Analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
48
1
4

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
48
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, boys’ reports of recreational support increased significantly over the year whereas girls’ reports remained stable (and were similar to boys’ reports in the second year). Although these findings are inconsistent with research suggesting that boys tend to have larger peer groups (see Tietjen, 1982; Waldrop & Halverson, 1975), and that overall network size is not affected by gender (e.g., Garbarino et al , 1978), they are consistent with previous research suggesting that preschool, African‐American girls report having larger networks than boys (see Bost et al , 1994). The findings are also consistent with evidence suggesting that adolescent girls mention knowing more individuals (Coates, 1987) and name more informal sources of support including peers and other adults than do boys (Cauce, Felner & Primavera, 1982).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, boys’ reports of recreational support increased significantly over the year whereas girls’ reports remained stable (and were similar to boys’ reports in the second year). Although these findings are inconsistent with research suggesting that boys tend to have larger peer groups (see Tietjen, 1982; Waldrop & Halverson, 1975), and that overall network size is not affected by gender (e.g., Garbarino et al , 1978), they are consistent with previous research suggesting that preschool, African‐American girls report having larger networks than boys (see Bost et al , 1994). The findings are also consistent with evidence suggesting that adolescent girls mention knowing more individuals (Coates, 1987) and name more informal sources of support including peers and other adults than do boys (Cauce, Felner & Primavera, 1982).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…This interesting gender-specific finding in the crime-preventive effects of popularity has several possible explanations. First, girls’ friendships are more intimate and emotionally engaging than boys’ friendships (Waldrop and Halverson 1975). Thus, it is possible that close friendships among girls involve higher levels of attachment to their friends and are qualitatively different from those of boys whose friendships are not as intimate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is conceivable that gender serves as a moderator in these relationships for several reasons. First, girls form more emotionally involved friendships than boys do (Waldrop and Halverson 1975). Similarly, girls value and spend time cultivating close friendship relationships whereas boys tend to have loose friendships and assign more importance to simply being involved in different activities with their friends (Rose and Rudolph 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on kindergarten‐age and older children have suggested that boys have larger social networks than do girls (Ruble et al, 2006). Moreover, Waldrop and Halverson (1975) found that 7‐year‐old boys had more extensive peer relationships than did girls. Among younger children, however, the findings are mixed, with some studies suggesting that there are sex differences in the size of social networks and others finding no differences (Ruble et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%