2016
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter‐ and intrafractional dose uncertainty in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to evaluate inter‐ and intrafractional dose variations resulting from head position deviations for patients treated with the Extend relocatable frame system utilized in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). While previous reports characterized the residual setup and intrafraction uncertainties of the system, the dosimetric consequences have not been investigated. A digital gauge was used to measure the head position of 16 consecutive Extend patients (62 fractions) at th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commissioning and quality assurance has been presented, 14 and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional uncertainties has been studied. 15 Three reports of patient setup uncertainty with small patient numbers, 10 2 and 12, 3 , 4 have produced results that are consistent with our measurement of 0.48 (0.19) mm, taken on 352 consecutive treatments from 84 patients, which is a larger cohort than the combined previously published experiences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Commissioning and quality assurance has been presented, 14 and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional uncertainties has been studied. 15 Three reports of patient setup uncertainty with small patient numbers, 10 2 and 12, 3 , 4 have produced results that are consistent with our measurement of 0.48 (0.19) mm, taken on 352 consecutive treatments from 84 patients, which is a larger cohort than the combined previously published experiences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Placing this focus point at the intended position in the patient with low uncertainty is critical to the success of the procedure 2 . Uncertainty in targeting risks placing the high‐intensity portion of the dose distribution over incorrect anatomy, possibly resulting in a lower than desired dose to the target and a higher than desired dose to nearby normal anatomy 3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These positioning errors are still too large for SRS treatments, due to irradiating critical organs during the treatment. A study by Kim et al measured the intrafraction shift of 16 patients and found the average to be 0.39 mm, however, this small shift resulted in an average variation in maximum dose to organs at risk (OAR) of 7.15% 6. Image guidance significantly reduces the setup errors, and is essential for accurate delivery of SRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%