2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-Arm Differences in Blood Pressure and Mortality: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis and Development of a Prognostic Algorithm (Interpress-Ipd Collaboration)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An American study involving 3390 patients showed that IASBPD ≥10 mmHg and cardiovascular events were independently correlated (HR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.75) [14]. INTERPRESS-IPD research including 53827 participants showed that IASBPD was associated with cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12) per 5 mmHg [15]. However, a Japanese retrospective study involving 425 patients revealed no correlation between IASBPD and coronary artery disease [16]; the authors did not explain the reason for this conclusion, stating that they considered the lower prevalence of IASBPD ≥10 mmHg (8.7%) may have contributed to this finding, while the prevalence of IASBPD ≥10 mmHg was 7.05% in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An American study involving 3390 patients showed that IASBPD ≥10 mmHg and cardiovascular events were independently correlated (HR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.75) [14]. INTERPRESS-IPD research including 53827 participants showed that IASBPD was associated with cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12) per 5 mmHg [15]. However, a Japanese retrospective study involving 425 patients revealed no correlation between IASBPD and coronary artery disease [16]; the authors did not explain the reason for this conclusion, stating that they considered the lower prevalence of IASBPD ≥10 mmHg (8.7%) may have contributed to this finding, while the prevalence of IASBPD ≥10 mmHg was 7.05% in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous individual studies and study-level meta-analyses have also failed to show a positive correlation between size of hazard ratios for prospective mortality outcomes and magnitude of IAD, 8,12 although this has recently been shown in the authors' large (>57 000 records) individual participant data meta-analysis published in 2018. 13 The present study had few people (<3%) with an IAD ≥15 mmHg; it lacked power to explore IADs above the ≥10 mmHg threshold, and the sample size available for this study was too small to demonstrate trends in risk according to level of IAD. The limitations in measurement technique discussed above could also have contributed to the differences in associations seen between 5 mmHg and 10 mmHg IAD cut-offs.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…32 Nevertheless, these limitations make the blood pressure readings analogous to routine clinical measurements, and the prognostic value of IAD derived from sequential measurements in other studies has not differed significantly from that of simultaneous measurements. 8,13 To minimise the impact of test-to-test variability in cognitive assessments, valid criteria for a substantial reduction in cognition over time were adopted, and outcomes were adjusted for duration of follow-up. [25][26][27] The composite measure for cognitive decline has been reported from cross-sectional work, 28 but, to the authors' knowledge, it has not previously been reported in prospective analyses such as is presented here.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations