2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-epidemic Transmission of Rift Valley Fever in Livestock in the Kilombero River Valley, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Abstract: BackgroundIn recent years, evidence of Rift Valley fever (RVF) transmission during inter-epidemic periods in parts of Africa has increasingly been reported. The inter-epidemic transmissions generally pass undetected where there is no surveillance in the livestock or human populations. We studied the presence of and the determinants for inter-epidemic RVF transmission in an area experiencing annual flooding in southern Tanzania.MethodologyA cross-sectional sero-survey was conducted in randomly selected cattle, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

34
88
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
34
88
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Variation in seroprevelences between reports is described to be influenced by age of the animals, season of sampling, timing of sampling (during disease outbreak or during interepizootic), diagnostic test used, inter-mixing of animals under same husbandry practices, administrative localities of camel and virus maintenance and persistence of ecological factors. The sex of the animal was not statistically significantly associated with seropositivity in this study, and this is in agreement with the report of Sumaye et al (2013) and Ahmed et al (2011). However, a small proportion of males compared with females were sampled, which is likely to explain the observed sex-risk difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variation in seroprevelences between reports is described to be influenced by age of the animals, season of sampling, timing of sampling (during disease outbreak or during interepizootic), diagnostic test used, inter-mixing of animals under same husbandry practices, administrative localities of camel and virus maintenance and persistence of ecological factors. The sex of the animal was not statistically significantly associated with seropositivity in this study, and this is in agreement with the report of Sumaye et al (2013) and Ahmed et al (2011). However, a small proportion of males compared with females were sampled, which is likely to explain the observed sex-risk difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The current theory is that RVFV is maintained in aedine mosquito eggs and epidemics occur following an increase in the mosquito population after abnormally heavy rains (Tchouassi et al 2013), which occur classically every 10 years. Evidence of RVFV exposure has been shown to occur in African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) (Evans et al 2008;Bird et al 2008;LaBeaud et al 2011); giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) (Bird et al 2008), humans (Swai and Schoonman 2009;Pepin et al 2010;Heinrich et al 2012), cattle (Sumaye et al 2013) and in sheep (Rostal et al 2010;Fafetine et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This figure is close to the findings of 13.1% (n = 1396) seroprevalence reported in cattle in Ijara district, Kenya (Owange et al 2014). It was also high compared to the seroprevalence of 11.3% (n = 970) reported in cattle in the Kilombero river valley in Tanzania (Sumaye et al 2013), but lower than findings of 38.7% in cattle sampled from other areas in Tanzania (Chengula et al 2014). This variation could be because of the differences in sampling techniques, the diagnostic test used or the agro-ecological conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Per year, more than 3000 live ruminants are imported from Tanzania (Chief Veterinary Officer of Comorian Vet services, personal communication), where RVF is endemic [34]. These animals enter the Union, mostly Grande Comore, without any quarantine or clinical examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%