“…Among variables that usually reflect the effect of socio-economic advancement, the propensity to move towards, or to reside in, less segregated locations tends to be positively associated with the level of education, a certain level of income or having a good occupation, and negatively associated with being unemployed and home ownership (some of these variables appear in, for example, Bartel, 1989;Kritz and Nogle, 1994;Nogle, 1994Nogle, , 1997Moore and Rosenberg, 1995;Newbold, 1996;Beenstock, 1997Beenstock, , 1999Åslund, 2005;South et al, 2005;Ellis and Goodwin-White, 2006;Finney and Simpson, 2008;Iceland and Scopilliti, 2008;Zorlu and Mulder, 2008;Ishikawa and Liaw, 2009;Bolt and van Kempen, 2010;Tammaru and Kontuly, 2010;Kritz et al, 2011;Xu, 2011). The strengthening of social and cultural ties within the host country, normally proxied by indicators such as fluency in the native language, the acquisition of citizenship, the extent and type of contacts with the majority (or some other) population (for example, by means of intermarriage), as well as the length of residence (a supplementary proxy for integration), tend to be positively correlated with mobility towards, or residence in, less segregated locations (e.g.…”