2005
DOI: 10.1007/s12130-005-1005-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-organizational collaboration, knowledge intensity, and the sources of innovation in the bioscience-technology industries

Abstract: Center for the Development of Technological Leadership. His interests lay in strategic technology management, intellectual property management, technology-based entrepreneurship, technologybased industry development, and regional economic development planning. Much of his work has focused on life-science related industries. He holds doctoral degrees in both technology studies and strategic management. He also works in the area of technology commercialization education for the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Larsen, 2001), intra‐firm knowledge sharing (e.g. Robertson et al , 2003; Willoughby and Galvin, 2005; Taminiau et al , 2009), external knowledge acquisition (e.g. Bettancourt et al , 2002; Matusik and Heeley, 2005; Evanschitzky et al , 2007; Jenssen and Nybakk, 2009) and knowledge storage and documentation (e.g.…”
Section: Innovation As a Knowledge‐based Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larsen, 2001), intra‐firm knowledge sharing (e.g. Robertson et al , 2003; Willoughby and Galvin, 2005; Taminiau et al , 2009), external knowledge acquisition (e.g. Bettancourt et al , 2002; Matusik and Heeley, 2005; Evanschitzky et al , 2007; Jenssen and Nybakk, 2009) and knowledge storage and documentation (e.g.…”
Section: Innovation As a Knowledge‐based Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The geographic factor, namely spatial distance, turns out to be significant to the extent it affects the "cultural proximity" of cooperation partners: a common understanding of the context, shared goals, and ability to promptly exchange information during the project [Boschma, 2005;Torre, 2008]. • Partnership with science plays a special role [Caloghirou et al, 2004;Kaufmann, Tödtling, 2001;Perkmann, Walsh, 2007], i.e. with R&D organisations; its effectiveness depends on the overall level of the country's technological and innovation development [Castellacci, 2008;Dachs et al, 2008;Hayter et al, 2018].…”
Section: Cooperation In Modern Innovation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Географический фактор, а именно пространственная удаленность, оказывается значимым в той мере, в какой от этого зависит «культурная» близость партнеров по кооперации -общее понимание контекста, единство целей и возможности оперативного обмена информацией по ходу реализации проекта [Boschma, 2005;Torre, 2008]. • Особая роль принадлежит партнерству с наукой [Caloghirou et al, 2004;Kaufmann, Tödtling, 2001;, т. е. с организациями сектора ИиР, эффективность которой зависит от общего уровня технологического и инновационного развития страны [Castellacci, 2008;Dachs et al, 2008;Hayter et al, 2018]. Формат международных гармонизированных исследований позволяет эффективно выявлять национальную специфику.…”
Section: кооперация в современных моделях инновационной деятельностиunclassified