DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between a Disabled Person and a Scanning Communication Aid: Towards an Automatic Adjustment of the Scanning Rate Adapted to the User

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following two rules (the anticipations/errors algorithm) are thus implemented [Ghedira et al 2008]. …”
Section: Algorithm For An Adaptive Adjustment Of Tscanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following two rules (the anticipations/errors algorithm) are thus implemented [Ghedira et al 2008]. …”
Section: Algorithm For An Adaptive Adjustment Of Tscanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The player component allows the customization of the AAC and the interface between several input interaction modes (pointing device, eye tracker, joystick, speech recognition, on/off switch). The platform also allows various control modes to be configured (pointing, time delay click, scanning system [16]) according to the abilities of disabled people. Table 1.…”
Section: Description Of the Sokeyto Plateformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning strategy. The SoKeyTo platform makes it possible to define several interaction modes, including the scanning technique [16]. The configuration parameters are the scanning direction (row then column or column then row, the specification of the scanning block, the scanning speed, the associated visual feedbacks, etc.…”
Section: Specification Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In character-level disambiguation mode (Table 4), the rate is 10.32 for the same parameters, and ranges from 8.56 to 13.00 wpm. Although in this paper we fix the scan period and weights, this is done merely to obtain an estimation of the performance, and to draw conclusions about the systems, but the parameters have to be measured running an experiment with users, and the scan period adapted specifically for each user [12], [22], [35]. Figure 6 shows the weighted number of keystrokes according to w C for both disambiguation modes.…”
Section: Journal Of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%