2012
DOI: 10.3923/ajbs.2012.183.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction Between Building Design and Indoor Airborne Microbial Load in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The microbial analysis of indoor air quality carried out in this study revealed a count range of 200 -11850 CFU/m 3 and these were generally (12/14) above the recommended acceptable standards. This range was however similar to two previously published reports on air quality in Port Harcourt (Wemedo et al, 2012;Agbagwa and Onyeamachi, 2014), which reported ranges of 1230 -6660 and 1500 -12540 respectively. Also, these ranges were similar to those of several studies carried out in Ethiopia, which noted microbial loads with ranges of 117 -7284, 397 -2595, 511 -9960 and3106 -9733 (Kabir et al, 2016;Hayleeyesus and Manaye, 2014;Hayleeyesus et al, 2015;Fekadu and Getachewu, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review/summary Of Literaturesupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The microbial analysis of indoor air quality carried out in this study revealed a count range of 200 -11850 CFU/m 3 and these were generally (12/14) above the recommended acceptable standards. This range was however similar to two previously published reports on air quality in Port Harcourt (Wemedo et al, 2012;Agbagwa and Onyeamachi, 2014), which reported ranges of 1230 -6660 and 1500 -12540 respectively. Also, these ranges were similar to those of several studies carried out in Ethiopia, which noted microbial loads with ranges of 117 -7284, 397 -2595, 511 -9960 and3106 -9733 (Kabir et al, 2016;Hayleeyesus and Manaye, 2014;Hayleeyesus et al, 2015;Fekadu and Getachewu, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review/summary Of Literaturesupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Of the 5 studies, only 2 represented the results of their study as CFU/m 3 (Udochukwu et al, 2015;Emuren and Ordinioha, 2016).These studies did not however describe how these values were obtained, and reported values ranging from 5.33 -227.33 CFU/m 3 . Two other studies (Wemedo et al, 2012;Agbagwa and Onyeamachi, 2014) presented their results as CFU/30min and simply as "no of colonies". Conversion of these values to CFU/m 3 based on the Omeliansky formula (Borrego et al, 2012) showed a wide variation in microbial load present, with a rangeof 1230 -12540 CFU/m 3 .…”
Section: Literature Review/summary Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition of air is considered satisfactory if quantity of moldy mushrooms per 1m 3 does not exceed 300-500 (CFU/m 3 ) [13,16]. However, we have paid attention not only to quantity of moldy mushrooms, but also to presence of Staphylococcus in the air.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two rooms similar in volume (195m 3) , air temperature (+ 25 С 0 ), air humidity (20%) and illumination (500-2000 lx) were chosen. The windows faced the north-west.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation