1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.18.4580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between classical and quantum systems: A new approach to quantum measurement.I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand compound classical systems are described on the Cartesian product of the component's phase spaces. Attempts to formulate a consistent dynamical theory of interacting quantumclassical, commonly called hybrid, systems are numerous as is illustrated by the following rather partial list of references [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Current technologies are sufficiently developed to enable experimental studies of the interaction between typically quantum and typically classical objects [9,10], but such experiments require detailed preliminary theoretical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand compound classical systems are described on the Cartesian product of the component's phase spaces. Attempts to formulate a consistent dynamical theory of interacting quantumclassical, commonly called hybrid, systems are numerous as is illustrated by the following rather partial list of references [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Current technologies are sufficiently developed to enable experimental studies of the interaction between typically quantum and typically classical objects [9,10], but such experiments require detailed preliminary theoretical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us mention that in a series of papers Sudarshan first proposed this hybrid formalism as a way of understanding quantum measurement [7][8][9]. In doing that he restricted the types of interaction terms that one can consistently introduce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all these approaches one starts with initially separated purely classical and quantum sectors and then makes them interact in order to analyze the outcome. Without pretending to be exhaustive, we can classify these approaches in the following categories: (1) approaches that try to maintain the use of quantum states (or density matrices) to describe the quantum sector and trajectories for the classical sector [2,3], (2) those that first formulate the classical sector as a quantum theory [4][5][6] and then work with a formally completely quantum system [7][8][9][10][11], (3) conversely, those that first formulate the quantum sector as a classical theory [12] and then work with a formally completely classical system [13][14][15][16], and (4) approaches that take the quantum and the classical sectors to a common language and then extend it to a single framework in the presence of interactions, for instance, using Hamilton-Jacobi statistical theory for the classical sector and Madelung representation for the quantum sector [17][18][19] or modeling classical and quantum dynamics starting from Ehrenfest equations [20]. This classification is not sharp and in some cases is subject to interpretation, but it may be useful as a way to organize the possible procedures and conceptual viewpoints in the enterprise of constructing a hybrid theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as we have seen, the dynamical equations for classical and quantum systems are different. It is precisely this point, largely glossed over, that is addressed by Sudarshan's approach [4,112,113,114,115]. As we have seen, he proposed that the KvNS formalism can be looked upon as an embedding of the classical system in a quantum system with a continuum of superselection sectors.…”
Section: Realism and Non-contextualitymentioning
confidence: 99%