2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between local hydrodynamics and algal community in epilithic biofilm

Abstract: Interactions between epilithic biofilm and local hydrodynamics were investigated in an experimental flume. Epilithic biofilm from a natural river was grown over a 41-day period in three sections with different flow velocities (0.10, 0.25 and 0.40 m s(-1) noted LV, IV and HV respectively). Friction velocities u* and boundary layer parameters were inferred from PIV measurement in the three sections and related to the biofilm structure. The results show that there were no significant differences in Dry Mass and A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In laboratory studies Stoodley et al (1999) found that in laminar flow the colonization rate was higher than under turbulent conditions (and obviously higher than the detachment), resulting in an earlier development of biofilm. Similar results for a delayed colonization were obtained recently by Graba et al (2013). They reported higher detachment rates in the early stages of biofilm formation induced by higher bed shear stress during cultivation.…”
Section: The Impact Of Environmental Conditions On Biostabilization Isupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In laboratory studies Stoodley et al (1999) found that in laminar flow the colonization rate was higher than under turbulent conditions (and obviously higher than the detachment), resulting in an earlier development of biofilm. Similar results for a delayed colonization were obtained recently by Graba et al (2013). They reported higher detachment rates in the early stages of biofilm formation induced by higher bed shear stress during cultivation.…”
Section: The Impact Of Environmental Conditions On Biostabilization Isupporting
confidence: 90%
“…and environmental factors (e.g., nutrients, irradiance, hydrodynamic regimes, predatory pressures, etc.) (Rosemond et al, 2000;Soininen & Eloranta, 2004;Yang et al, 2009;Graba et al, 2013). Algal short-term dynamics usually involve two phases: the first, accrual phase, which is driven by immigration/colonization and exponential growth, and the second, loss phase, which is dominated by processes of death, emigration, sloughing, and grazing (Biggs, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have attempted to quantify biostabilisation in a variety of environments (Paterson, 1989;Dade et al, 1990;Amos et al, 1998;Tolhurst et al, 1999Tolhurst et al, , 2003Friend et al, 2003a;Droppo et al, 2007;Righetti and Lucarelli, 2007;Vignaga et al, 2012;Graba et al, 2013;Thom et al, 2015). These studies generally show a positive correlation between EPS content and sediment stability measured as the threshold for erosion, although variations in space and time (Friend et al, 2003b;Thom et al, 2015) and between cohesive and noncohesive sandy environments are large.…”
Section: W I Van De Lageweg Et Al: Quantifying Biostabilisation Efmentioning
confidence: 99%