1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00384-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of brain cannabinoid receptors with guanine nucleotide binding protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35 S] GTPγS binding to membranes obtained from rat cerebellum or rat or mouse whole brain (Burkey et al 1997;Leggett et al 2004;Petitet et al 1997;Savinainen et al 2001). Finally, docosahexaenoylethanolamide and eicosapentaenoylethanolamide each appear to stimulate […”
Section: [ 35 S]gtpgs Binding Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 S] GTPγS binding to membranes obtained from rat cerebellum or rat or mouse whole brain (Burkey et al 1997;Leggett et al 2004;Petitet et al 1997;Savinainen et al 2001). Finally, docosahexaenoylethanolamide and eicosapentaenoylethanolamide each appear to stimulate […”
Section: [ 35 S]gtpgs Binding Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, (-)-∆ 8 -THC resembles (-)-∆ 9 -THC both in its CB 1 and CB 2 receptor affinities (Table 2) and in its relative intrinsic activity at the CB 1 receptor (Gérard et al 1991;Howlett and Fleming 1984;Matsuda et al 1990). Cannabinol also behaves as a partial agonist at CB 1 receptors but has even less relative intrinsic activity than (-)-∆ 9 -THC (Howlett 1987;Matsuda et al 1990;Petitet et al 1997Petitet et al , 1998. Whilst there is one report that cannabinol activates CB 2 receptors in the cyclic AMP assay more effectively than ∆ 9 -THC (Rhee et al 1997), there is another that in the GTPγS binding assay, it behaves as a CB 2 receptor inverse agonist (MacLennan et al 1998).…”
Section: Cannabinoid Receptor Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite various papers described SR141716A as an antagonist [56][57][58], today this compound is considered to act as an inverse agonist based on [ 35 S]-GTPγ S [59][60][61][62] and cAMP accumulation assays [62][63][64] (Table 2). An interesting review dealing with inverse agonism at the cannabinoid receptors, and mostly with SR141716A effects, was recently published by Roger Pertwee [65].…”
Section: Diarylpyrazole Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%