1970
DOI: 10.1070/pu1970v013n02abeh004234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Electrons and Photons with a Very Strong Electromagnetic Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
509
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(521 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
509
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The invariant numerator in (12), originally introduced in [14] as (F µν p ν ) 2 , is indeed proportional to the energy density seen by the charge, as in the charge rest frame, where p = (m e , 0), one has p µ T µν p ν = m 2 e T 00 = m 2 e (E 2 + B 2 )/2. The general relativistic analogue of this is an important characteristic of curved space times, constrained by positive energy theorems [15].…”
Section: Motion In Plane Wave Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invariant numerator in (12), originally introduced in [14] as (F µν p ν ) 2 , is indeed proportional to the energy density seen by the charge, as in the charge rest frame, where p = (m e , 0), one has p µ T µν p ν = m 2 e T 00 = m 2 e (E 2 + B 2 )/2. The general relativistic analogue of this is an important characteristic of curved space times, constrained by positive energy theorems [15].…”
Section: Motion In Plane Wave Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the dependence of this non-perturbative phenomenon on the field profile E(t, r) away from the constant field approximation is still mostly terra incognita. There are many results for fields which depend on one coordinate only, such as space x or time t (see, e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]), one of the light-cone coordinates x ± = t ± x (see, e.g., [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]), or other linear combinations of x and t [29]. In these cases, the underlying (Dirac or Klein-Fock-Gordon) equation simplifies to an ordinary differential equation (allowing for a WKB approach, for example, see also [30][31][32][33][34]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their paper "Quantum beamstrahlung" [113] they showed that the well-known Blankenbecler-Drell formula [114] for the bremsstrahlung energy loss of a relativistic electron passing through the field of a cylindric charge agrees with the popular 'Russian formula' [115][116][117][118] if the spin-flip contributions were added to Blankenbecler-Drell approach.…”
Section: B Joint Work Of the Bellsmentioning
confidence: 99%