“…18 On the basis of the I−I bond distance (d) and bond order (n) (which may be estimated according to the Pauling's equation 19 ), the I 2 -adducts may be classified into weak or medium-weak adducts (type 1 D•••I 2 adducts; d in the 2.72− 2.85 Å range, n > 0.6) and strong adducts (type 2 D−I−I threebody system adducts; d about 2.90 Å, bond orders of both D−I and I−I in the 0.4−0.6 range), according to Deplano et al 18 The XRD data obtained for the adducts 3 and 4 allow to calculate n values of 0.64 and 0.62, respectively (i.e., at the borderline between type 1 and type 2 adducts). However, the presence of two stretching bands, observed in the Raman spectra of the synthesized adducts (Figure 13 and Figure SI-5 of the Supporting Information) at about 110 cm −1 (ν 1 symmetric N−I−I stretching) and 150 cm −1 (ν 3 antisymmetric N−I−I stretching), not present in the donors, suggests the existence of a N−I−I three-body system, according to the assignments proposed by Arca et al 20 From this point-of-view, the I 2 -adducts under study appear significantly different from those obtained by other authors using other N-donors, since they show N•••I distances shorter than most complexes reported in the literature, 21 according to the strong n → σ* donor character of quinuclidine, related to the high pK a value of its conjugate acid. 22 Pyridine-, pyrazine-, and quinoxaline-based donors have been reported to be characterized by N•••I distances significantly higher than ours (i.e., 2.562, 2.817, and 2.994 Å, respectively); 23−25 not unexpectedly, these adducts show in their Raman spectra a single band, 23,24 in agreement with their weak nature.…”