2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009gl041858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of multiple magnetic islands in a long current sheet: Two‐fluid simulations

Abstract: [1] We have studied the magnetic island coalescence process in an open system with two-fluid simulations including electron inertial effects. We have found that the two X-lines at the lateral-edges of a perturbed current sheet possess the intrinsic advantage to dominate and to create an inflating magnetic island between them. While this state will eventually be taken over by the well-known single X-line structure, the double X-line state can be extended in time and is expected commonly in maturing stages of re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reconnection rate is greatly reduced only when outflow from both sides of the current sheet is blocked. This helps explain results by Oka et al [2008], who found that the presence of an obstacle on one downstream side of the current sheet does not greatly impact the reconnection rate, and by Nakamura et al [2010], who found that initial X‐lines near the edges of a region of multiple X‐lines tend to win out over X‐lines in the central part of that region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reconnection rate is greatly reduced only when outflow from both sides of the current sheet is blocked. This helps explain results by Oka et al [2008], who found that the presence of an obstacle on one downstream side of the current sheet does not greatly impact the reconnection rate, and by Nakamura et al [2010], who found that initial X‐lines near the edges of a region of multiple X‐lines tend to win out over X‐lines in the central part of that region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Reconnection occurring at each of these sites will in general be asymmetric in the inflow and outflow directions, as well as the out‐of‐plane direction. Reconnection processes involving multiple competing reconnection sites or multiple magnetic islands [e.g., Lee and Fu , 1986; Drake et al , 2006; J. Lin et al , 2008; Chen et al , 2009; Nakamura et al , 2010] will also likely involve asymmetry in the outflow direction, especially if the X‐lines are not evenly spaced or develop at different rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two‐dimensional particle‐in‐cell simulations of reconnection in the presence of a magnetic wall ahead of an outflow demonstrated that the sufficiently piled‐up magnetic field from the wall side causes the X‐line to retreat with a speed that is ∼0.1 times the Alfvén speed V A [ Oka et al , ]. Two‐dimensional two‐fluid simulations demonstrated that a similar X‐line retreating can also be caused by the interaction of X‐lines (multiple reconnection) in the current sheet [ Nakamura et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1 Multiple X-line reconnection 3.1.1 Models of multiple X-line reconnection Multiple X-line reconnection or tearing instabilities in the magnetopause have been put forward as one mechanism for FTE generation (Lee and Fu, 1985). This process is essentially time-dependent because an X-line exists in the direction of the outflow jet from another X-line such that the activity of the former X-line can be affected by that of the latter, and vice versa (e.g., Nakamura et al, 2010b). (Note, however, that if the X-line has a relatively short extent, as inferred from FTE observations reported by Fear et al (2010), multiple X-lines and the resultant reconnection jets may exist more or less independently of each other.)…”
Section: Temporal Aspects Of Magnetopause Reconnectionmentioning
confidence: 99%