“…These changes likely arise from the affinity of the sorbate for different moieties in the polymer; highly polar water molecules (ε ∼ 80) strongly solvate sulfonic acid moieties but display minimal affinity for perfluoroether side chains, resulting in a strong phase separation and a relatively sharp fluoropolymer–water interface. Alcohols and acetone have been shown to interact with the perfluoroether side chains, partition across the water–fluoropolymer interface, and impact the fluoropolymer matrix. − ,− , The implications of this modified water–fluoropolymer interface on the structure and transport are qualitatively similar to changes incurred by the cation partitioning processes, which alter the ionic character and local environment. ,,,,− In the case of organic sorbates, however, the extent of these interfacial modulations changes significantly with the sorbate type and polarity, with broad implications for domain-network morphology. Increased mixing of the sorbate and fluoropolymer would have the following impacts on ionomer domain structure and conductivity summarized in Figure : (i) reduced phase separation and redistribution of sorbate across the liquid–fluoropolymer interface, (ii) significant changes in the shape and ordering of ionomer domains accompanied by disruption of the domain-network, and (iii) increased penetration of the fluoropolymer into swollen ionomer channels.…”