Does the global precedence effect depend on the goodness of the global form and low spatial frequencies? In Experiments 1 and 2, under a variety of attentional and task conditions, a global advantage in response time (RT) occurred in "good," many-element compound patterns but not in "poor," few-element patterns (unless the local elements were too small to be easily recognized). Symmetric interference effects were found in all patterns, however, suggesting that global and local information were encoded in parallel and that the global advantage in RT involved BOme postperceptual processes. Experiments 3A and 3B showed that the global advantage in RT and perceived pattern goodness depend on low spatial frequencies: Lowpass-filtered patterns rated as "good" showed the usual global advantage in RT, but highpass-filtered, many-element forms rated as "poor" did not. These findings suggest that a global advantage in RT requires an unambiguous global form conveyed by low spatial frequencies.An important issue in visual perception is how we come to recognize objects and patterns derived from particular arrangements of their parts. Gestalt psychologists have long suggested that the perceptual coherence and dominance of wholes results from basic organizing principles such as proximity, similarity, good continuation, and closure (Koehler, 1947). From this view, the goodness of the global form determines whether a pattern or its parts would be recognized first. More current work has shown that good form benefits all stages of information processing. For example, good form facilitates encoding (Bell & Handel, 1976;Garner & Sutliff, 1974) as well as memory and comparison processes (Checkosky & Whitlock, 1973).Unlike the Gestalt view, recent work by Navon (1977, 1981, 1991) has suggested a different explanation for the priority of wholes over parts. Navon's primary hypothesis is that the pattern or global level of a form is always encoded faster than is more local information and hence is available sooner to recognition and response processes. The probable source for this temporal advantage is the operation of fast-conducting, visual mechanisms tuned to the low spatial frequencies of the global form (Navon, 1981;Petersik, 1978). Thus, according to this hypotheThe research and preparation of the manuscript were supported by NICHD Grant HD05331 to Peter D. Eimas and by NIMH Post-Doctoral Training Grant MH16745 to Linda L. laGasse. This research was based on a dissertation submitted in partial fulftllment of a doctoral degree at Brown University. I want to thank my advisor, Peter Eirnas, for his many contributions to this study. Practical assistance was also provided by Terry Au, Einar Siqueland, David Knill, Philippe Schyns, and Kathy Spoehr. I am further indebted to Sandy Pollatsek for his ideas during the preparation of this manuscript, and to Lester Krueger, Michael Venturino, and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments. Correspondence should be addressed to Linda L. laGasse, Infant Development Unit, Women and Infant...