Interactions among threats affect conservation management outcomes: Livestock grazing removes the benefits of fire management for small mammals in Australian tropical savannas

Abstract

Conservation scientists and practitioners usually focus on understanding and managing individual threats to biodiversity. However, threats may interact, making management outcomes unpredictable. Here, we investigated whether interactions between fire regimes and introduced livestock affect the conservation goal of population recovery for small mammals in Australia's tropical savannas, using a longterm and landscape-scale study. Mammal richness and abundance increased as management reduced the average annual fire extent and frequency at large and medium scales. However, these relationships between fire and richness and abundance were only evident in areas where introduced livestock were removed. This interaction may arise because predation by feral cats is amplified in areas with reduced vegetation ground cover, and cover is reduced over longer periods when livestock have access to burnt areas, because they selectively graze regenerating grass. Fire management for conservation receives substantial investment across northern Australia, and in savannas worldwide; this study shows that without appropriate management of other factors, this investment may be ineffective. More broadly, managing single threats to biodiversity may be compromised if interactions between threats are not explicitly considered. This study provides an example of how such interactions can be evaluated for improved biodiversity conservation. K E Y W O R D Sferal cats, fire management, fire regimes, grazing impacts, small mammals, threat interactions, tropical savannas

Fear and stressing in predator–prey ecology: considering the twin stressors of predators and people on mammals

“…If two or more stressors are present, the resultant combined stress may present severe challenges to an individual's physiological systems (Johnstone, Lill & Reina, 2012;Brearley et al, 2013;Malcolm et al, 2014;Arlettaz et al, 2015;Geary et al, 2019;Legge et al, 2019). Interactive fear and stress effects are context-dependent (Belarde & Railsback, 2016).…”

We need to worry about Bella and Charlie: the impacts of pet cats on Australian wildlife

“…Cats affect native species mostly through predation, but also through disease transmission, hybridisation with other (native) species of Felis, and by affecting the behaviour of prey in ways that reduce their lifetime fitness (Beckerman et al 2007;Dubey and Jones 2008;Medina et al 2011;Doherty et al 2016). Cats also interact with and compound the impacts of other threats such as changed fire regimes and pastoralism (McGregor et al 2014;Legge et al 2019).…”

Cat ecology, impacts and management in Australia

“…Research in northwestern Australia has demonstrated that cats hunt more efficiently in heavily grazed and severely burnt areas, and as a result cats are drawn from far-afield to hunt in such areas (McGregor et al 2014(McGregor et al , 2015(McGregor et al , 2016. The combination of increased cat density and hunting success causes the mortality rates of small mammals living in such places to increase dramatically (Leahy et al 2015;McGregor et al 2016), with population-level effects occurring (Legge et al 2019). The synergistic interaction between invasive predators and major disturbances has been similarly documented in Victorian forests (Hradsky et al 2017).…”